N. D. OJHA, R. S. PATHAK, L. M. SHARMA
Paluru Ramkrishnaiah: R. D. Degaonkar: Sahab Singh Verma: M. U. Ahmed And 7 Others: Chander Nathani: A. K. Saxena: Virendra Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
Judgment
OJHA, J.:- The petitioners in the a fore mentioned writ petitions claim to have been appointed as Supervisors Grade A in various ordnance factories between 1962 to 1966 and have filed these writ petitions with the prayer that the same relief may be granted to them also as was granted by this Court to 75 appellants in Civil Appeal No. 441 of 1981 vide its order dated 2nd February, 1981 (reported in AIR 1981 SC 1775 (1)). The three civil miscellaneous petitions referred to above on the other hand have been made by the appellants of Civil Appeal No. 441 of 1981 asserting that the direction given by this Court on 2nd February, 1981 has not been complied with in the manner as it ought to have been by the respondents and they should be consequently required to comply with the said direction. The exact nature of the prayer made in these miscellaneous application shall be indicated after referring to the relief granted on 2nd February, 1981 in Civil Appeal No. 441 of 1981.
2. The 75 appellants of Civil Appeal No. 441 of 1981 filed a writ petition in the Allahabad High Court in 1972 asserting that they had been appointed as Supervisors Grade A on various dates in pursuance of a circ
Relied on : Ramchandra Shankar Deodhar v. State of Maharashtra
Union of India v. Somasundaram Viswanath
Referred to : B. N. Nagarajan v. State of Mysore
Sant Ram Shanna v. State of Rajasthan
Relied on : Ramchandra Shankar Deodhar v. State of Maharashtra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.