B. C. RAY, SABYASACHI MUKHARJEE
Mahabir Auto Stores – Appellant
Versus
Indian Oil Corporation LTD. – Respondent
Judgment
SABYASACHI MUKHARJI, C.J.I. :- Having heard counsel for the parties and having considered the facts, circumstances and the contentions involved herein, we grant special leave and dispose of the appeal by judgment herein.
2. This appeal arises out of the judgment and order of the High Court of Delhi dated 9th February, 1983, Appellant No. 1 is a partnership firm. The other four appellants are the partners of the said firm. The respondent is a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1956 and having, inter alia, one of its regional offices at Janpath, New Delhi. The appellants sought in the Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution before the High Court a writ of mandamus against the respondent directing it to desist from denying or discontinuing the supply of all kinds of lubricants to the appellant No. 1 and from ousting, blacklisting, coercing or pressurising the appellant No. 1 from the business of dealing with all kinds of lubricants supplied by the respondent company to have and to continue to supply all kinds of lubricants to the appellant firm as was done in the past and for the maintenance of status quo existing on the 27th May, 1953 and fo
relied on : Radha Krishna Agarwal v. State of Bihar
E.P. Royappa v. State of Tamil Nadu
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India
Ajay Hasia v. Khalid Majib Sehravardi
R.D. Shetty v. International Airport Authority of India
Dwarkadas Marfatia and Sons v. Boards of Trustees of the Port of Bombay
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.