SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

1995 Supreme(SC) 153

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
A.M. AHMADI, C.J.I., M.M. PUNCHHI AND K. RAMASWAMY, JJ.
Writ Petition (C) No.206 of 1986
Decided on 27-1-1995.
Consumer Education and Research Centre and others, Petitioners
Versus
Union of India and others, Respondents.

Advocates:
A.S.BHASME, B.K.PRASAD, C.V.SUBBA RAO, D.N.Mishra, G.Prabhakar, Indu Malhotra, JOSEPH PUKKATT, K.RAM KUMAR, KRISHAN KUMAR GOGNA, M.VIRAPPA, N.N.GOSWAMY, P.H.Parekh, PREMA KOHLI, PUNAM MADAN, R.N.SACH, R.RAMACHANDRAN, R.SASIPRABHU, Rakesh U.Upadhyay, Ravindra Narayan, S.K.AGNIHOTRI, S.K.SABHARWAL, S.KACHVALA, S.N.TERDAL, S.SUKUMARAN, VASIM A.QADRI, VINOD KUMAR

The Court held that the right to health and medical care for workers, both during and after employment, is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution, read with Directive Principles of State Policy, to ensure a meaningful life with human dignity.

Headnote:

Constitution Of India,1950 - Article 32 - workmen employed in asbestos industries - Workmens Compensation - Occupational accidents and diseases remain most appealing human tragedy of modern industry and one of its most serious forms of economic waste- Occupational health hazard and diseases workmen employed in asbestos industries are of our concern in this writ petition Constitution by way of public interest litigation at behest of petitioner an accredited - At inception of filing writ petition though highlighted lacuna in diverse provisions of law applicable to asbestos industry due to orders of this court passed from time to time though wide gaps have been bridged by subordinate legislation yet lot more need be done So petitioner seeks to fill in yearning gaps and remedial measures for protection of health of workers engaged in mines and asbestos industries with adequate mechanism for and diagnosis and control silent killer diseases asbestosis with amended prayers –Held, Vienna Convention and Rules issued All factories whether covered by Employees State Insurance or Compensation Act or otherwise are directed to compulsorily insure health coverage to every worker Union and State Governments are directed review standards of permissible exposure limit value in tune with international standards reducing permissible content as prayed in writ petition referred to at beginning- review shall continued after every also and when gives directions in this behalf consistent with its recommendations any Conventions Union and all State Governments are directed to consider inclusion of such of those small scale factory or factories or industries to protect health hazards of worker engaged in manufacture of asbestos or its ancillary products appropriate Inspector of Factories in particular of State of Gujarat is directed to send all workers examined by concerned ESI hospital for re-examination by National Institute of Occupational Health to detect whether all any of m are suffering from asbestosis- In case of positive finding that all or any of m are suffering from occupational health hazards each such worker shall be entitled to compensation in a sum of rupees one payable by concerned factory or industry or establishment within period of three months from date of certification by National Institute of Occupational Health - Petitions allowed

Act Referred

Legal Category Hierarchy

  • constitutional law
    • fundamental rights
      • right to life
        • right to health (Para 26, 27)
        • human dignity (Para 24, 25)
    • directive principles of state policy (Para 20, 23)
  • labour and employment law
    • occupational health and safety
      • asbestos exposure (Para 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 32, 33)
      • factories act (Para 1, 2, 32)
    • workers compensation (Para 31, 32, 33)
  • tort
    • vicarious liability (Para 31)
  • international law
    • ilo conventions (Para 3, 4, 5, 32)

Table of Contents

1. Public interest litigation under Article 32 seeking health protections, exposure limits, and compensation for workers in asbestos industries due to occupational diseases. (Para 1 )

2. Petitioner seeks mandatory health records, adoption of specific filter tests, compulsory insurance, reduced exposure limits, and compensation for workers suffering from asbestosis. (Para 1 )

3. The court analyzed international asbestos conventions and ILO rules, linking occupational health and safety to the fundamental right to life and human dignity. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 )

4. The right to health and medical aid for workers, both during service and post-retirement, is a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution. (Para 27 )

5. Petition allowed; directions issued for health record maintenance, adoption of membrane filter tests, compulsory insurance, exposure limit reviews, and worker compensation. (Para 33 )

6. Is the right to health and medical care a fundamental right for workers?

Yes, the court held that the right to health and medical aid to protect the vigour of a worker, both during service and post-retirement, is a fundamental right under Article 21, read with Articles 39(e), 41, 43, and 48A. (Para 27 )

7. What is the liability of an employer regarding occupational health hazards?

Employers have a legal, moral, and social responsibility to provide protective measures. They are vicariously liable to pay damages and compensation for health hazards causing disease, including liability that extends after the cessation of employment. (Para 19 , 31 , 32 )

8. Can compensation for fundamental rights violations be granted under Articles 32 or 226?

Yes, compensation in public law is a remedy available under Articles 32 or 226 for the enforcement and protection of fundamental and human rights, and the defence of sovereign immunity is inapplicable. (Para 31 )

9. How is the right to life under Article 21 interpreted in the context of occupational health?

The right to life encompasses more than mere animal existence; it includes the right to livelihood, hygienic conditions in the workplace, and the right to live with human dignity and robust health. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 )

JUDGMENT

K. RAMASWAMY, J. :—Occupational accidents and diseases remain the most appealing human tragedy of modern industry and one of its most serious forms of economic waste. Occupational health hazard and diseases to the workmen employed in asbestos industries are of our concern in this writ petition field under Article 32 of the Constitution by way of public interest litigation at the behest of the petitioner, an accredited organisation. At the inception of filing the writ petition in the year 1986, though it highlighted the lacuna in diverse provisions of law applicable to the asbestos industry, due to orders of this court passed from time to time, though wide gaps have been bridged by subordinate legislation, yet lot more need to be done, So the petitioner seeks to fill in the yearning gaps and remedial measures for the protection of the health of the workers engaged in mines and asbestos industries with adequate mechanism for and diagnosis and control of the silent killer diseases asbestosis with amended prayers as under:-

(a) Directions to all the industries and the official- respondent to maintain compulsorily and keep preserved health records of each workman for a period of 40 years from the date of beginning of the employment or 10 years after the cessation of the employment whichever is later;

(b) To direct all the factories to adopt THE MEMBRANE FILTER TEST;

(c) To direct all industries to compulsorily insure the employees working in their respective industries, excluding those already covered by the Employees State Insurance Act and the Workmen Compensation Act so as to entitle the workmen to get adequate compensation for occupational hazards or diseases or death;

(d) To direct the authorities to appoint a committee of experts to determine the standard of permissible exposure limit value of 2 fibre/cc and to reduce to i-fibre/cc for Chrystolite type of asbestos, 0-5-fibre/cc for Amosite type of asbestos and for the time being 0-2 fibre/cc for Crocidolite type of asbestos at par with the international standards;

(e) To direct the appropriate Governments to cover the workmen and to extend them Factories Act or by suitable regulatory provisions contained therein to all small scale sectors which are not covered under the Factories Act;

(f) To direct re-examination of such of those persons who are found suffering from Asbestosis by National Institute of Occupational Health but not the ESI hospitals; and in particular the Inspector of factories, Gujarat, be directed to have re-examined all those workmen, examined by ESI by NGDH and to award compensation; and

(g) To direct the Central Government to appoint a committee to recommend whether dry process can be completely replaced by wet process.

2. It would appear from the record that in Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh and Rajasthan, there exists about thirty mines and the workmen employed therein are about 1061. There are about 74 asbestos industries in nine States, namely, Haryana, Delhi, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Rajasthan, Maharashtra, Kerala, Gujarat and Madhya Pradesh. It would also appear that as on August 1986 there are about 11,000 workmen employed in those industries. Basing on Biswas Committee report, the petitioner filed the writ petition. The Central Govt. accepting the said report,framed model Rule 123A of Factories Act and on its model relevant laws and Rules were amended and are now brought into force. We are not referring to the findings and recommendations of Biswas Committee as the "Asbestos Convention, 1986" covered the whole ground.

3. In Convention 162 of the International Labour Conference (ILC) held in June, 1986, it had adopted on 24th June,1986 the Convention called "the Asbestos Convention, 1986". India is one of the signatories to the Convention and it played a commendable role suggesting suitable amendments in the preparatory conferences. It has come into force from June 16, 1989, after its ratification by the Member-States. Article 2(a) defines "asbestos" t














































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top