K.RAMASWAMY, M.N.VENKATACHALIAH
Life Assurance Corporation Of India – Appellant
Versus
Consumer Education And Research Centre – Respondent
JUDGMENT
K. RAMASWAMY, J.: —Leave granted Delay condoned.
2. The appeal and cross appeal arise from the Division Bench judgment of Gujarat High Court dated January 31, 1994 in Spl. Civil Application No. 2614 of 1980. On August 25, 1980 one Prof. Manubhai Shah Executive trustee of Respondent No. 1 and Mr. D. N. Dalal sought policies under Table 58. Similarly in December,1978 Respondent Nos 2 to 4 sought similar policies for convertible term insurance plans for different amounts. In September, 1980 Respondent Nos. 6 and 7 agents of the appellants when presented proposals to the LIC under Table 58 on behalf of individual respondents and promised to cover under Table 58 other 9 crores uninsured households, the LIC turned them down. Consequently after issuance of a notice through counsel on September 14, 1980, the respondents filed the above writ petition. The conditions imposed and denial to accept policies sought under Table 58 were assailed arbitrary, discriminatory, violating Articles 14,19 (1) (g) and right to life in Article 21 of the Constitution. The High Court while upholding that prescription of conditions, for 1st class lives as eligibility and other criteria laid down in the
relied on : Erusian Equipment and Chemicals Ltd. v. State of W.B.
A. Sanjeevi Naidu v. State of Madras
Ramana Dayaram Shetty v. International Airport Authority of India
Kasturi Lal Lakshmi Reddy v. State of J and K
Dwarkadas Marfatia and Sons v. Board of Trustees of the Port of Bombay
Mahabir Auto Stores v. India Oil Corpn
Kumari Shrilekha Vldyarthi v. State of U. P.
Food Corpn of India v. Kamdhenu Cattle Feed Industries
Sterling Computers Ltd. v. M and N Publications Ltd.
Union of India v. Graphic Industries Co
Central Inland Water Transport Corpn. Ltd v. Brojo Nath Ganguly
Delhi Transport Corpn. v. D.T.C. Mazdoor Congress
Workmen v. Meenakshi Mills Ltd.
Consumer Education and Research Centre v. Union of India
Olge Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corpn
CESC Ltd. v. Subhash Chandra Base
Consumer Education and Research Centre v. Union of India
Regional Director, E.S.I. Corpn. v. Francis De Costa
Murlidhar Dayandeo Kesekar v. Vlshwanath Pandu Barde
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India
distinguished : General Assurance Society Ltd. v. Chandumull Jain
Shri Anadi Mukta Trust v. V.R. Rudani
Unni Krishnan, J.P. v. State of A.P.
Hochtief Gammon v. State of orissa
Praga Tools Corpn. v. C.A. Imanual
Comptroller and Auditor General of India v. K.S. Jagannathan
relied on : National Textiles Workers Union v. P.R. Ramakrishnan
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.