ARIJIT PASAYAT, S.H.KAPADIA
State Of N. C. T. Of Delhi – Appellant
Versus
Sanjeev @ Bittoo – Respondent
Judgment
Arijit Pasayat, J.—Leave granted.
2. The true scope and ambit of Section 51 of the Delhi Police Act, 1978 (in short the ‘Act’) falls for determination. Notice dated 20.5.2002, was issued by Deputy Commissioner of Police, (South-West) District, New Delhi, under Section 50 of the Act requiring the noticee to show cause as to why action in terms of Section 47 of the Act should not be taken against him. In the notice it was noted that since March 1997 he was engaged in several illegal acts in his activities and movement in the area of P.S. Dwarka, were causing alarm to the residents. List of 7 cases under various penal statutes on the basis of the records of the concerned police station was given. It was indicated that the witnesses including camera witnesses were not willing to give evidence in public against him because of the fear of danger to their person and properties. There was no written reply to the notice, but the noticee appeared and examined a witness to show that he was innocent. After the grant of further opportunities appellant No.5-Additional Deputy Commissioner of Police passed an order under Section 47 of the Act directing that the respondent should remove hims
State of U.P. and Ors. v. Renusagar Power Co. and Ors.
Commissioner of Income-tax v. Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd.
Pandharinath Shridhar Rangnekar v. Dy. Commissioner of Police, The State of Maharashtra
Gazi Sududdin v. State of Maharashtra and another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.