SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(SC) 493

2006(5) Supreme 662
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
(From Calcutta High Court)
B.P. Singh and S.B. Sinha, JJ.
Mcdermott International Inc. - Appellant
versus
Burn Standard Co. Ltd. & Ors. - Respondents
I.A. Nos. 2-3
In
Civil Appeal No. 4492 of 1998
Decided on 12-5-2006
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellant : Dipankar Gupta, Sr. Advocate, Anil Bhatnagar, O.P. Khaitan, Mrs. Bharti Badesra for M/s. O.P. Khaitan & Co., Advocates.
For the Respondents : Jayanto Mitra, Debal Banerjee, Sr. Advocates, Pallav Sisodia, Rudgaman Bhattacharya, Ms. Shipra Ghose, Advocates.

IMPORTANT POINTS
1. A partial award is in effect and substance an interim award within the meaning of Section 31(6) and 2(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and thus, the validity of the partial award is not open to question.
2. Sections 55 and 73 of the Indian Contract Act do not lay down the mode and manner as to how and in what manner the computation of damages or compensation has to be made. There is nothing in Indian law to show that any of the formula adopted in other countries is prohibited in law or the same would be inconsistent with the law prevailing in India.
3. The construction of the contract agreement, is within the jurisdiction of the arbitrators having regard to the wide nature, scope and ambit of the arbitration agreement and they cannot, be said to have misdirected themselves in passing the award by taking into consideration the conduct of the parties.

Headnote:

Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Sections 34, 2(e) and 8 -Application under S. 34 of the Act- Arbitrator was appointed by Supreme Court observing that any application which may become necessary to be filed during or after the conclusion of arbitration proceedings, shall be filed only in the Supreme Court- Therefore application under S. 34 of the Act could be filed only in the Supreme Court. [Paras 3 and 4]

Judgement Key Points

The provided legal document does not explicitly mention or discuss the concept of idle labor, idling charges, or idle manpower. There are no references or discussions related to claims, compensation, or considerations specifically addressing costs incurred due to labor or manpower being idle or unproductive during the course of the contract or arbitration proceedings.


JUDGMENT

S.B. Sinha, J. —

INTRODUCTION

Oil was discovered in the Bombay High Region in 1974 whereupon a plan of rapid development of off-shore oil and gas production was embarked by the Government of India through Oil and Natural Gas Commission (ONGC). With a view to achieve exploration of production programme, ONGC appointed contractors to fulfill substantial portions of its off-shore construction requirements. Burn Standard Company Limited (for short "BSCL") was interested in the second stage of platform construction of ONGC, i.e., structural and progress fabrication and material procurement. Four contracts were thereafter awarded in favour of BSCL for fabrication, transportation and installation of six platforms bearing No. ED, EE, WI-8, WI-9, WI-10 and N3 and associated pipelines. They were to be installed in ONGCs Bombay High Sea.

CONTRACT

2. The said contracts covered:

(i)Material procurement and fabrication of the ED and EE jackets, piles and decks.

(ii)Transportation and installation of the ED and EE jackets, piles and decks.

(iii)Material Procurement and fabrication of the WI-8, WI-9, WI-10 and N-3 Jackets, piles, temporary decks and decks (the "Four Platform Fabrication Main Contract") and

(iv)Transportation and installation of the WI-8, WI-9, WI-10 and N-3 jackets, piles, temporary decks and decks, and installation of four pipelines and eight risers (the "Four Platform Installation Main Contract").

The said contracts contained arbitration agreements.

3. BSCL and Mcdermott International Inc. (for short "MII") entered into Technical Collaboration Agreement on 25th September, 1984 in terms whereof the latter agreed to transfer technology to the former with regard to design, construction and operation of a fabrication yard. The said agreement contains a separate arbitration clause between the parties.

4. However, with regard to the fabrication and installation of off-shore platforms, BSCL decided to give a sub-contract of the work to MII on a project by project basis. BSCL while retained the job of fabrication of the ED and EE decks, six helidecks and procurement of materials for the overall project other than pipeline materials and some process equipment which was issued by ONGC sub-contracted the remaining work.

5. In terms of a letter of intent dated 14th September, 1984 a contract was entered into by and between BSCL and ONGC for fabrication and installation of offshore platforms ED, EE, WI-8, WI-9, WI-10 and N-3 and laying of WI-8 to WI-9, WI-9 to WI-10, WI-9 to WIS and N-3 to NO pipelines and 8 associated risers as well as WI-7 to WI-8, WI-9 to SD, WI-10 to SV, EB to SC1, EC to SHP, ED to SHP, EE to SHP pipelines and 11 associated risers. A part of the said contract work was assigned to MII in respect of fabrication, transporation and installation of structures, modules, platforms and pipeline components on or about 1st January, 1986. The work under the said agreement was to be completed within 24 months but in all respects it was completed in early 1989.

TERMS OF THE CONTRACT

6. The relevant covenants between the parties contained in the said agreement are as under:

"Article 2. MII shall unless inconsistent with the provisions of this Sub-contract perform fulfill and observe all the obligations, covenants and agreements required on the part of BSCL to be performed, fulfilled and observed in terms of the Main Contracts to the extent these obligations, covenants and agreements relate to the Sub-contract Work including such obligations, agreements and covenants as may in future be added, modified or provided in the Main Contracts between the Buyer and BSCL with concurrence of MII to the extent thereof. These obligations, covenants and agreements, as have been agreed to be performed, fulfilled and observed by MII shall include the performance of the Sub-contract work in the manner and to the specifications as provided in the respective Main Contracts.

Article 3

3.1 MII shall be bound to BSCL by the terms of this S


















































































































































































































































































































































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top