SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(SC) 830

S.B.SINHA, MARKANDEY KATJU
S. Rathinam @ Kuppamuthu – Appellant
Versus
L. S. Mariappan – Respondent


JUDGMENT

S.B. SINHA, J.—

1.Whether right to manage a temple and/or shebaitship can be a subject matter of testamentary succession is the question involved in this appeal, which arises out of a judgment and decree dated 09.08.2000 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court of Madras in L.P.A. No. 62 of 1991, affirming a judgment and decree dated 28.01.1991 passed by a learned Single Judge of the said Court in A.S. No. 661 of 1979.

2.A private family temple known as ‘Pechiamman Temple’ was founded by one Palanichamy Chettiar. The genealogical table of the said Palanichamy Chettiar is as under :

PALANICHAMI CHETTIAR

L.P. Lakshmanan ChettiarShanmugam @ Palanichami Chettiar

|Thangam @ Palanichami ChettiarShanmugam @ Chellam @ Subbiah

Palanichami Chettiar (Died) Ramalingam

|

L.S. Mariappan


Rathinam @ Lakshmanan Chellam @ Subbiah Patchaimuthu Shanmugham

Kuppumuthu (Died) Palanisami

3.The founder of the trust dedicated properties for the maintenance of the temple and performance of Pujas consisting of four shop rooms in the front and a fe


























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top