S.B.SINHA, MARKANDEY KATJU
S. Rathinam @ Kuppamuthu – Appellant
Versus
L. S. Mariappan – Respondent
JUDGMENT
S.B. SINHA, J.—
1.Whether right to manage a temple and/or shebaitship can be a subject matter of testamentary succession is the question involved in this appeal, which arises out of a judgment and decree dated 09.08.2000 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court of Madras in L.P.A. No. 62 of 1991, affirming a judgment and decree dated 28.01.1991 passed by a learned Single Judge of the said Court in A.S. No. 661 of 1979.
2.A private family temple known as ‘Pechiamman Temple’ was founded by one Palanichamy Chettiar. The genealogical table of the said Palanichamy Chettiar is as under :
PALANICHAMI CHETTIAR
L.P. Lakshmanan ChettiarShanmugam @ Palanichami Chettiar
|Thangam @ Palanichami ChettiarShanmugam @ Chellam @ Subbiah
Palanichami Chettiar (Died) Ramalingam
|
L.S. Mariappan
Rathinam @ Lakshmanan Chellam @ Subbiah Patchaimuthu Shanmugham
Kuppumuthu (Died) Palanisami
3.The founder of the trust dedicated properties for the maintenance of the temple and performance of Pujas consisting of four shop rooms in the front and a fe
Angurbala Mullick v. Debabrata Mullick
Ranbir Das and Another etc. v. Kalyan Das and Another
Uma Devi Nambiar and Others v. T.C. Sidhan (Dead)
Kakinada Annadana Samajam etc. v. The Commissioner of Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments
Kali Kinkor Ganguly v. Panna Banerjee and Others
Shambhu Charan Shukla v. Shri Thakur Ladli Radha Chandra Madan Gopalji Maharaj and Another
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.