State of Punjab vs Joginder Singh - 1962 Supreme(SC) 373

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

1962 Supreme(SC) 373

State of Punjab – Appellant
Versus
Joginder Singh – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
Mr. C. K Daphtary, Solicitor-General of India, Mr. L. D. Kaushal Addl. Advocate General, for the State of
Punjab and Mr. N. S. Bindra, Sr. Advocate (Mr. R. H. Dhebar, Advocate, with them), for Appellant; Mr. C. B. Agarwala, Sr. Advocate (Mr. A, N. Goyal, Advocate, with him), for Respondent.

Judgement

AYYANGAR, J., (Majority judgment: B. P. Sinha, C.J.I. and Wanchoo and Ayyanger, JJ.) This is an appeal by Special Leave against the judgment of the High Court of Punjab dated October 3, 1961. That judgment was rendered in a petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution filed by the respondent - Joginder Singh and by their order allowing the said petition in part, the learned Judges struck down R. 2 (d) and (e) and a part of R. 3 of the Punjab Educational Service (Provincialised Cadre) Class III Rules 1961,which for convenience we shall call the impugned rules, on the ground that those clauses were violative of the rights guaranteed by Art. 14 and Art. 16 (1) of the Constitution.

2. Certain facts have to be stated in order to appreciate both the manner in which the question was raised as well as the decision of the learned Judges now under appeal.

3. The respondent was before the 1st October 1957 working as a "Junior vernacular teacher" in a District Board High School in District Hoshiarpur. The points in controversy in this appeal turn on the precise changes which were effected in the status and conditions of service of teachers like the respondent employed in District Board a