R.V.RAVEENDRAN, B.SUDERSHAN REDDY
State of Madhya Pradesh – Appellant
Versus
Yogendra Shrivastava – Respondent
ORDER
R.V.Raveendran, J.—
Delay condoned and leave granted in the SLPs. The question involved in these appeals filed by the State of Madhya Pradesh, relates to the quantum of Non- Practicing Allowance (‘NPA’ for short) payable to certain categories of Medical Officers belonging to the State Insurance service.
2. The Madhya Pradesh Employees State Insurance Service (Gazetted) Recruitment Rules, 1981 (in short ‘the Rules’) framed by the State Government came into force in the year 1982. Rule (5) of the Rules provides that classification of the service, the scales of pay attached thereto and the number of posts included in the service shall be in accordance with the provisions contained in Schedule I thereto. The scales of pay and NPA payable to different categories of Medical Officers, other than the Director of the Service, are extracted below from Schedule I to the Rules:
Non-Practising Allowance is paid to Medical Officers when private practice by medical officers was prohibited and abolished.
3. Even though the rules specified that the aforesaid categories of Medical Officers were entitled to NPA linked to their pay (that is 25% of the basic pay), the letters of appointment issue
M.R. Gupta vs.Union of India - 1995 (5) SCC 628
Union of India vs. Tarsem Singh 2008 (8) SCC 648]
K. Dayananda Lalvs. State of Kerala - 1996 (9) SCC 728
State of Karnataka vs. K.G.S.D. Canteen Employees Welfare Association - 2006 (1) SCC 567
Punjab National Bank vs. Astamija Dash - 2008 (14) SCC 370).
N.C. Singhal vs. Director General
K. C. Arora vs. State of Haryana - 1984 (3) SCC 281; Relied.(Para 12)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.