S.B.SINHA, CYRIAC JOSEPH
Mir Nagvi Askari – Appellant
Versus
C. B. I. – Respondent
Judgment :-
S.B. Sinha, J.
These five appeals, arising out of a judgment and order dated 19/10/2004 passed by the Special Court constituted under the Special Court (Trial and Offences related to Securities) Act, 1992 (for short "the Act"), were taken up for hearing together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.
BACKGROUND FACTS
Andhra Bank is a Scheduled Nationalised Bank. It has a branch at Mumbai known as the Fort Branch. Out of five appellants before us, Accused Nos. 1, 2, 4 and 5 were officers of the said Branch of the Andhra Bank. Accused No. 1 was the Manager of Funds, Accused Nos. 2 and 4 were Junior Management Officers of the Funds Department, and Accused No. 5 was the Assistant Manager, Debit Section. Accused No.3, Hiten Dalal, was at all relevant times and still is a broker and, inter alia, deals in securities.
Accused Nos. 1, 2, 4 and 5, in their capacity as public servants, were working in the Fort Branch of Andhra Bank.
They were charged with abuse of their position and acting dishonestly and fraudulently, as a result whereof undue pecuniary advantage is said to have been procured by Accused No. 3 by way of crediting bankers cheques without them having been
Dr. Vimla v. Delhi Administration
Mohammad Usman Mohammad Hussain Maniyar & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra (1981) 2 SCC 443
Kehar Singh and Ors. v. State (Delhi Administration)
State of Maharashtra v. Som Nath Thapa (1996) 4 SCC 659
C. Chenga Reddy v. State of A.P.
Mohmed Amin @ Amin Choteli Rahim Miyan Shaikh and Anr. v. C.B.I. through its Director
Onkar Nath Mishra and Ors. vs. State (NCT of Delhi) and Anr.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.