DALVEER BHANDARI, MUKUNDAKAM SHARMA
State of Haryana – Appellant
Versus
Manoj Kumar – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dalveer Bhandari, J. —
1. Leave granted.
2. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 4.2.2008 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh in a Civil Writ Petition No. 12094 of 2007.
3. The appellants are aggrieved by the impugned judgment of the High Court by which the High Court has set aside the concurrent findings of courts below while exercising its extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.
4. Brief facts which are necessary to dispose of this appeal are as under:-
5. On 10.11.1999, an agreement to sell a commercial plot measuring 788 sq.yards located on Delhi-Mathura Mewla Maharajpur, Faridabad was executed by Smt. Manjula Gulati in favour of respondent, Manoj Kumar. The entire sale consideration was paid and the actual possession was also given, but the sale deed was not executed till 9.2.2001.
6. According to the appellants, in order to evade substantial stamp duty, the respondent filed a suit, without impleading the appellants as parties to the suit, for specific performance of agreement to sell dated 10.11.1999 executed by Smt. Gulati for the sale of property measuring 788 sq.yards for
Nibaran Chandra Bag v. Mahendra Nath Ghughu AIR 1963 SC 1895
Mohd. Yunus v. Mohd. Mustaqim & Others (1983) 4 SCC 566
Laxmikant Revchand Bhojwani & Another v. Pratapsing Mohansingh Pardeshi (1995) 6 SCC 576
Rena Drego (Mrs.)v. Lalchand Soni & Others (1998) 3 SCC 341
Virendra Kashinath Ravat & Another v. Vinayak N. Joshi & Others (1999) 1 SCC 47
State of Punjab & Others v. Mohabir Singh etc.etc. (1996) 1 SCC 609
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.