R.V.RAVEENDRAN, R.M.LODHA
Anand Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGEMENT
R.M. Lodha, J. —
Of this group of ten appeals, 7 arise from the common judgment and order dated May 6, 2005 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad. The remaining 3 appeals arise from separate judgments (dated January 18, 2007, March 22, 2007 and April 25, 2007) and in one of them, the common judgment and order dated May 6, 2005 was followed. As identical questions are involved, these appeals were heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.
2.The appellants in these appeals have small holdings of land in Manbela, Hamidpur and Jangal Sikri etc., Pargana Haveli, District Gorakhpur in the State of Uttar Pradesh. About 209.515 hectares of land including the land of the appellants was sought to be acquired for the public purpose, namely, for residential colony by the Gorakhpur Development Authority (GDA), Gorakhpur. Vide public notices issued under sub-section (1) of Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short, ‘the Act’) on November 22, 2003 and February 20, 2004 notifying for general information that the land mentioned in the schedule appended thereto was needed for the said public purpose. The provisions of sub- section (1) of Sect
Raja Anand Brahma Shah v. State of Uttar Pradesh
Narayan Govind Gavate v. State of Maharashtra
State of Punjab v. Gurdial Singh
Deepak Pahwa v. Lt. Governor of Delhi
State of U.P. v. Smt. Pista Devi
Rajasthan Housing Board v. Shri Kishan
Chameli Singh v. State of U.P.
Meerut Development Authority v. Satbir Singh
Union of India v. Krishan Lal Arneja
Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. v. Darius Shapur Chenai
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.