R.M.LODHA, JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR
Alister Anthony Pareira – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
Societal deterrence is a fundamental objective of the criminal justice system, aimed at preventing future crimes and maintaining social order. The principles underlying sentencing emphasize that punishment should be proportionate to the gravity of the offense and serve as a warning to society at large. When the law imposes appropriate and adequate sentences for serious offenses, especially those that pose a significant danger to public safety, it reinforces societal norms and discourages similar conduct by others. The deterrent effect is further strengthened when courts consider the severity of the crime, the manner in which it was committed, and the societal impact, ensuring that punishment reflects the seriousness of the offense and the societal abhorrence of such acts. This approach helps in fostering a sense of justice, discouraging reckless or negligent behavior, and promoting responsible conduct among individuals, thereby contributing to societal stability and safety.
JUDGEMENT
R.M. Lodha, J.
On the South-North Road at the East side of Carter Road, Bandra (West), Mumbai in the early hours of November 12, 2006 between 3.45 - 4.00 a.m., a car ran into the pavement killing seven persons and causing injuries to eight persons. The appellant - Alister Anthony Pareira - was at the wheels. He has been convicted by the High Court for the offences punishable under Sections 304 Part II, 338 and 337 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC).
2. The prosecution case against the appellant is this: the repair and construction work of the Carter Road, Bandra (West) at the relevant time was being carried out by New India Construction Company. The labourers were engaged by the construction company for executing the works. The temporary sheds (huts) were put up for the residence of labourers on the pavement. In the night of November 11, 2006 and November 12, 2006, the labourers were asleep in front of their huts on the pavement. Between 3.45 to 4.00 a.m., that night, the appellant while driving the car (corolla) bearing Registration No. MH-01-R-580 rashly and negligently with knowledge that people were asleep on footpath rammed the car over the pavement; caused deat
State of M.P. v. Munna Choubey, (2005) 2 SCC 710
Hari Singh v. Sukhbir Singh & Ors
Sarwan Singh & Ors. v. State of Punjab, (1978) 4 SCC 111
Dilip S. Dahanukar v. Kotak Mahindra Co. Ltd. & Anr, (2007) 6 SCC 528
Ghulam Din Buch & Ors. v. State of J &K 1996 (9) SCC 239
Kuldip Singh & Ors. v. State of Delhi, 2003 (12) SCC 528
Jai Prakash v. State (Delhi Administration), 1991 (2) SCC 32
Joti Parshad v. State of Haryana, 1993 Supp (2) SCC 497
Willie (William) Slaney v. State of Madhya Pradesh, AIR 1956 SC 116
Dalbir Singh v. State of U.P. , 2004 (5) SCC 334
Annareddy Sambasiva Reddy and others v. State of Andhra Pradesh, 2009 (12) SCC 546
Shivaji Sahabrao Bobade and another v. State of Maharashtra, 1973 (2) SCC 793
State of Karnataka v. Krishnappa, 2000 (4) SCC 75
Dalbir Singh v. State of Haryana, 2000 (5) SCC 82
Shailesh Jasvantbhai and another v. State of Gujarat and others, 2006 (2) SCC 359
Manish Jalan v. State of Karnataka
Prabhakaran Vs. State of Kerala, 2007 (14) SCC 269
Jai Dev Vs. State of Punjab, AIR 1963 SC 612
Shivaji Sahabrao Bobade and Anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra, 2008 (16) SCC 328
State of M.P. v. Saleem alias Chamaru & Anr, 2005 (5) SCC 554
Dhananjoy Chatterjee alias Dhana v. State of W.B., (1994) 2 SCC 220
Ravji alias Ram Chandra v. State of Rajasthan, (1996) 2 SCC 175
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.