DEEPAK VERMA, DIPAK MISRA
Vishwanath S/o Sitaram Agrawal – Appellant
Versus
Sau. Sarla Vishwanath Agrawal – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dipak Misra, J.
Leave granted.
2. The marriage between the appellant and the respondent was solemnized on the 30th of April, 1979 as per the Hindu rites at Akola. In the wedlock, two sons, namely, Vishal and Rahul, were born on 23.9.1982 and 1.11.1984 respectively. As the appellant-husband felt that there was total discord in their marital life and compatibility looked like a mirage, he filed a petition for divorce under Section 13(1) (ia) of The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for brevity ‘the Act’).
3. It was the case of the appellant before the court of first instance that the respondent-wife did not know how to conduct herself as a wife and daughter-in-law and despite persuasion, her behavioural pattern remained unchanged. The birth of the children had no impact on her conduct and everything worsened with the efflux of time. The behaviour of the respondent with the relatives and guests who used to come to their house was far from being desirable and, in fact, it exhibited arrogance and lack of culture and, in a way, endangered the social reputation of the family. That apart, she did not have the slightest respect for her mother-in-law. Despite the old lady being a patient of
Sirajmohamedkhan Janmohamadkhan v. Hafizunnisa Yasinkhan
Praveen Mehta v. Inderjit Mehta
Vijaykumar Ramchandra Bhate v. Neela Vijaykumar Bhate
Vinita Saxena v. Pankaj Pandit
Kulwant Kaur v. Gurdial Singh Mann (dead) by L.Rs.
Major Singh v. Rattan Singh (Dead) by LRs
Abdul Raheem v. Karnataka Electricity Board
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.