H. L. DATTU, MADAN B. LOKUR, A. K. SIKRI
Ram Kanwar – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
ORDER
1. Delay condoned in filing Appeals/Special leave petitions and in application(s) for substitution, if any.
2. Application(s) for substitution is/are allowed, if any.
3. These appeals are directed against the common judgment and order passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana in Regular First Appeal No. 1824 of 2006, dated 01.10.2010, whereby and whereunder, the High Court while modifying the order passed by the Reference Court has enhanced the compensation awarded by the Reference Court.
4. For disposal of these appeals, we would only notice the facts in Civil Appeal No. 5598 OF 2011.
5. Brief facts of the case : The acquiring authority had issued Notification No. LAC(G)-97/455 under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short "the Act") to acquire certain extent of lands in villages Kanhai, Wazirabad, Chakerpur and Sikanderpur for the public purpose viz. development and utilization of land for residential, commercial, institutional and open-space area. After due consideration of the objections filed by the land-losers under Section 5-A of the Act, the acquiring authority had recommended issuance of a notification under Section 6 of the Act to the State Government
Administrator General of W.B. v. Collector, Varanasi
Bangaru Narasingha Rao Naidu v. Revenue Divisional Officer
Charan Dass v. H.P. Housing & Urban Development Authority
Mehta Ravindrarai Ajitrai v. State of Gujarat
Printers House (P) Ltd. v. Saiyadan
Prithvi Raj Taneja v. State of M.P
Raghubans Narain Singh v. U.P. Govt.
Vyricherala Narayana Gajapatiraju Bahadur Garu v. Revenue Divisional Officer, Vizagapatnam
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.