ARUN MISHRA, AMITAVA ROY
Haryana Urban Development Authority – Appellant
Versus
Orchid Infrastructure Developers P. Ltd. – Respondent
Certainly! Please provide the legal document content or specify the key points you'd like me to analyze, and I will identify the relevant references accordingly.
JUDGMENT
ARUN MISHRA, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. The appeal arises out of judgment and order dated 17.1.2011 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh thereby setting aside the judgment and decree of District Judge dated 29.11.2010 and restoring the judgment and decree of Civil Judge passed on 14.10.2010. The plaintiff Bhudeep Builders and Exporters Pvt. Ltd. were later renamed as M/s. Orchid Infrastructure Developers P. Ltd. The plaintiff-respondent filed a suit for declaration with consequential relief as against the appellants with regard to rejection of bid relating to the commercial tower situated in Sector 29, Urban Estate, Gurgaon, in area admeasuring 9.527 acres. The bid submitted by the plaintiff was the highest of Rs.11,17,50,000/-. The reserve price was Rs.106.65 crores. The main terms and conditions of the auction were as under :
(i) 10% of the bid amount to be tendered on the spot at fall of hammer.
(ii) 15% of the bid money to be deposited within 30 days from the date of issuance of allotment letter.
(iii) 75% of the amount to be paid within 60 days f
M/s. Star Enterprises v. City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Ltd.
Mohinder Singh Gill v. The Chief Election Commissioner, New Delhi
Kalu Ram Ahuja v. Delhi Development Authority
Uttar Pradesh Avas Evam Vikas Parishad v. Om Prakash Sharma
State of Uttar Pradesh v. Vijay Bahadur Singh
Meerut Development Authority v. Association of Management Studies
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.