J.CHELAMESWAR, A.M.SAPRE
Gohil Vishvaraj Hanubhai – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
CHELAMESWAR, J.
1. Leave granted.
2. These appeals are preferred against the final judgment dated 27 June 2016 of the High court of Gujarat in Letters Patent Appeal No. 73 of 2016 in Special Civil Application No. 11149 of 2015 with Letters Patent Appeal No. 74 of 2016 in Civil Application No. 11685 of 2015 with Civil Application No.1066 of 2016 in Letters Patent Appeal No. 74 of 2016 with Special Civil Application No 11149 of 2015. The facts leading to the instant litigation are as follows:
3. The Appellants herein are candidates who successfully appeared in the examination conducted by the Respondents for recruitment to the post of Revenue Talati but were not appointed.
4. The State of Gujarat decided to create a new post of Revenue Talati, under the control of the Revenue Department. Revenue talatis are to maintain revenue records, collect revenue etc. The creation of these posts is meant to ease the burden on existing talati-cum-mantris who were under the control of the Panchayat Department, performing duties relating to maintenance of land records and various duties incidental thereto.
5. A total of 1800 posts of Revenue Talati were created by a Government Resolution dated
Tata Cellular v. Union of India
Siemens Public Communication v. Union of India
Chairman, All India Railway Recruitment Board v. K Shyam Kumar
Sterling Computers Ltd. v. M.N. Publications Ltd.
State of A.P. v. P.V. Hanumantha Rao
Ramana Dayaram Shetty v. International Airport Authority of India
Nidhi Kaim v. State of Madhya Pradesh
Union of India v. Anand Kumar Pandey
Chairman All India Railway Recruitment Board v. K. Shyam Kumar
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.