SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(SC) 1086

RANJAN GOGOI, DEEPAK GUPTA, ANIRUDDHA BOSE
SATISH UKEY – Appellant
Versus
DEVENDRA GANGADHARRAO FADNAVIS – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant(s) :Balraj Dewan, Advocate
For the Respondent(s):Nishant Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, Anoop Kandari, A.P. Mayee, A. Rajarajan, Sanjeev Kumar Choudhary, Ranjeeta Rohatgi, Randhir Kumar Ojha, Abhimanue Shrestha, Advocates

JUDGMENT :

RANJAN GOGOI, CJI.

1. Leave granted.

2. The appellant– Satish Ukey is a practicing Advocate of the Bombay High Court. The first respondent is an elected member of the Maharashtra State Legislative Assembly and is presently holding the post of Chief Minister of the State of Maharashtra.

3. The appellant had filed a criminal complaint before the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Nagpur for registration of a case against the first respondent under Section 125-A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as “the 1951 Act”). The learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Nagpur by order dated 7th September, 2015 dismissed the complaint. In Revision, the learned Sessions Judge, Nagpur remanded the matter to the learned trial Court for a de novo consideration. Aggrieved, the first respondent moved the High Court and the High Court having set aside the order of the learned Sessions Judge by its judgment and order dated 3rd May, 2018, the prese

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top