1. Special leave petition dismissed. (Para 3 )
Back
Next 
2014 Supreme(SC) 1222
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
R.M. Lodha, CJI., Kurian Joseph, Rohinton Fali Nariman, JJ.
Union of India and Others - Petitioners
Versus
National Confederation for Development of Disabled & Anr. - Respondents
Special Leave to Appeal (C) No......CC No(s). 13344 of 2014 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 04/12/2013 in PIL No. 106 of 2010 passed by the High Court of Bombay)
Decided On : 12-09-2014
Important Points
The court condoned the procedural delay in filing the special leave petition but ultimately dismissed the petition.
Subject
Civil Law - Procedural Law
Headnote
(A) Civil Procedure - Condonation of Delay - Delay in filing special leave petition condoned. (Para 2)
(B) Special Leave Petition - Dismissal - Petition dismissed. (Para 3)
Facts of the case:
A special leave petition was filed challenging a final judgment and order passed by a High Court in a public interest litigation. There was an initial delay in filing the said petition.
Findings of Court:
The court condoned the delay associated with the filing of the special leave petition but dismissed the petition itself.
Issues: Whether the special leave petition warranted the court's interference.
Ratio Decidendi: After hearing the submissions on behalf of the petitioners, the court found no reason to grant leave, leading to the dismissal of the petition.
Result: Special leave petition is dismissed.
(B) Special Leave Petition - Dismissal - Petition dismissed. (Para 3)
Facts of the case:
A special leave petition was filed challenging a final judgment and order passed by a High Court in a public interest litigation. There was an initial delay in filing the said petition.
Findings of Court:
The court condoned the delay associated with the filing of the special leave petition but dismissed the petition itself.
Issues: Whether the special leave petition warranted the court's interference.
Ratio Decidendi: After hearing the submissions on behalf of the petitioners, the court found no reason to grant leave, leading to the dismissal of the petition.
Result: Special leave petition is dismissed.
Legal Category Hierarchy
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners:Ms. Pinky Anand, Additional Solicitor General, Rajiv Nanda, Rahul Kaushik and Ms. Sushma Suri, Advocates.
For the Respondents:R.S. Suri, Sr. Adv., Ms. Pallavi Tayal Chadda, Arpit Bhargava and Chanchal Kumar Ganguli, Advocates.
For the Petitioners:Ms. Pinky Anand, Additional Solicitor General, Rajiv Nanda, Rahul Kaushik and Ms. Sushma Suri, Advocates.
For the Respondents:R.S. Suri, Sr. Adv., Ms. Pallavi Tayal Chadda, Arpit Bhargava and Chanchal Kumar Ganguli, Advocates.
Table of Contents
ORDER :
Heard the learned Additional Solicitor General for the petitioners.
2. Delay in filing special leave petition is condoned.
3. Special leave petition is dismissed.
