Back
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
M.H. Kania, C.J.I., J.S. Verma, S.C. Agrawal, Yogeshwar Dayal, A.S. Anand, JJ.
Unni Krishnan J.P., Etc. - Petitioners
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh, Etc. - Respondents
WP(c) Nos. 607, 657, 602, 678 & SLP (c) Nos. 11791 of 1992 & 11852 of 1992 & T.P.(c) Nos. 486 & 493 of 1992
Decided On : 8-9-1992
Public service Commission – Condo nation of delay - Issue Rule in terms of the remaining prayers returnable on - Issue notice on the application for interim relief as well, returnable - Issue notice to Union of India. Liberty to serve the Central Agency - Notice is also directed to be issued to Medical Council of India - Liberty to serve in addition to normal course. Liberty to serve the notice on the Standing Counsel for State of Andhra Pradesh - Interlocutory Application - Application for intervention is allowed – Held, Issue Rule, returnable - Issue notice on the application for interim relief as well, returnable - Liberty to University Grants Commission as a party respondent. Rule be served on the University Grants Commission - Liberty to serve in addition to usual mode of service. Notice be served on Central Agency and the Standing Counsel for the State - Special leave granted - Issue notice on the application for stay, returnable - Liberty to serve in addition to usual mode of service - There will be ad interim stay of operation of the impugned judgment save and except that the appellants shall not collect any further fees. - High Court is requested to adjourn the proceedings before it till further orders - On the application of learned counsel for the petitioner prayer (c) of the writ petition is directed to be deleted - Issue Rule on the remaining prayers returnable - Issue notice on the application for interim relief as well, returnable - Liberty to serve in addition to usual mode of service. Liberty to serve the notice on the Central Agency and the Standing Counsel for the State of Maharashtra – Appeal dismissed
JUDGMENT :
Writ Petition No. 607 of 1992
1. On the application of Mr. K.K. Venugopal, learned senior counsel for the petitioner, prayer (i) of the writ petition is directed to be deleted.
2. Issue Rule in terms of the remaining prayers returnable on 22nd September, 1992. Issue notice on the application for interim relief as well, returnable on 22nd September, 1992.
3. Issue notice to Union of India. Liberty to serve the Central Agency.
4. Notice is also directed to be issued to Medical Council of India.
5. Liberty to serve dasti in addition to normal course. Liberty to serve the notice on the Standing Counsel for the State of Andhra Pradesh.
Interlocutory Application No. 2 of 1992
6. The application for intervention is allowed.
Writ Petition No. 657 of 1992
7. On the application of Mr. K.K. Venugopal, learned senior counsel for the petitioner, prayer (i) of the writ petition is directed to be deleted.
8. Issue Rule in terms of the remaining prayers, returnable on 22nd September, 1992.
9. Issue notice on the application for interim relief as well, returnable on 22nd September, 1992.
10. Liberty to serve dasti in addition to usual mode of service. Liberty to serve the Central Agency and the Standing Counsel for the State of Andhra Pradesh.
Writ Petition No. 602 of 1992
11. Issue Rule, returnable on 22nd September, 1992.
12. Issue notice on the application for interim relief as well, returnable on 22nd September, 1992.
13. Liberty to implead University Grants Commission as a party respondent. Rule be served on the University Grants Commission.
14. Liberty to serve dasti in addition to usual mode of service. Notice be served on the Central Agency and the Standing Counsel for the State
Special Leave Petition (C) No. 11791 of 1992
15. Special leave granted.
16. Issue notice on the application for stay, returnable on 22nd September, 1992.
17. Liberty to serve dasti in addition to usual mode of service.
18. There will be ad interim stay of operation of the impugned judgment save and except that the appellants shall not collect any further fees. The High Court is requested to adjourn the proceedings before it till further orders.
Writ Petition No. 678 of 1992
19. On the application of learned counsel for the petitioner prayer (c) of the writ petition is directed to be deleted.
20. Issue Rule on the remaining prayers returnable on 22nd September, 1992.
21. Issue notice on the application for interim relief as well, returnable on 22nd September, 1992.
22. Liberty to serve dasti in addition to usual mode of service. Liberty to serve the notice on the Central Agency and the Standing Counsel for the State of Maharashtra.
Transfer Petition Nos. 488 and 493 of 1992
23. To be on board on 22nd September, 1992.
Special Leave Petition (C) No. 11852 of 1992.
24. Taken on board.
25. To come up on 22nd September, 1992.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
