Jamia Masjid vs K. V. Rudrappa (Since Dead) By Lrs.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2021 Supreme(SC) 538

D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, VIKRAM NATH, HIMA KOHLI
Jamia Masjid – Appellant
Versus
K. V. Rudrappa (Since Dead) By Lrs. – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) :V. Mohana, Gopal Singh, Abhishek Kaushik, R Kothwal, M.Yogesh Kanna, Raja Rajeshwaran. Advocates
For the Respondent(s):Basava Prabhu Patil, Balaji Srinivasan, Shanmukhappa, Shwetha Shanmukhappa, Prateek Yadav, Ashok Mathur, Kumar Mihir, Advocates

JUDGMENT :

Dhananjaya Y. Chandrachud, J

Index

A.		The Facts
B.		Proceedings before the Courts
C.		Proceedings before the High Court
D.		Submissions of the Parties
E.		The Analysis
	E.1	Res Judicata as a Preliminary issue
	E.2	The Plea of Res Judicata and the three previous suits
	E.2.1	Determination of title in a Representative suit
	E.2.2	Representative Suit and Res judicata
	E.2.3	Conclusive decision and Res Judicata
	E.2.3.1	Similarity in issue and Res Judicata
	E.2.4	Compromise decree and Res Judicata
F.		The Conclusion

1. A Single Judge of the High Court of Karnataka dismissed a second appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908¹[“CPC”], affirming the decision of the Trial Court and the First Appellate Court that the suit instituted by the appellant-plaintiff is barred by the principle of res judicata. The appellant moved this court in a Special Leave Petition to challenge the decision of the Single judge. Leave has been granted on 8 December 2014.

A. The F

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2021 Supreme(SC) 538

D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, VIKRAM NATH, HIMA KOHLIJamia Masjid – AppellantVersusK. V. Rudrappa (Since Dead) By Lrs. – Respondent

Cases Referred (22)

D. Y. CHANDRACHUD, VIKRAM NATH, HIMA KOHLI
Jamia Masjid – Appellant
Versus
K. V. Rudrappa (Since Dead) By Lrs. – Respondent