State of Punjab vs Anshika Goyal - 2022 Supreme(SC) 96

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(SC) 96

M.R.SHAH, B.V.NAGARATHNA
State of Punjab – Appellant
Versus
Anshika Goyal – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) : Ms. Uttara Babbar, AOR Ms. Ranjeeta Rohatgi, AOR
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Tushar Bakshi, AOR Mr. R. P. Sharma, AOR Mr. Deepak Goel, AOR Mr. Ritesh Khara, Adv. Mr. Pawan Kumar Ray, Adv. Mr. Vipin Kumar, Adv. Mr. Kamal Kumar Pandey, Adv. Ms. Baby Devi Bonia, Adv. Ms. Urvashi Sharma, Adv. Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Adv. Ms. Rubi Kumari, Adv. Mr. Siddhartha Jha, AOR Mr. K. Parameshwar, AOR Ms. A. Sregurupriya, Adv. Mr. Prasad Hegde, Adv. Mr. Pushpinder Singh, Adv. Ms. Anmol Sharma, Adv. Mr. Gajender Singh, Adv. Ms. Shalini Kaul, AOR

JUDGMENT :

M.R. SHAH, J.

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned common judgment and order dated 26.07.2019 and 08.08.2019 passed by the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh in CWP No.17248/2019 and CWP No. 18989 of 2019, by which the High Court has allowed the said writ petitions and has directed the State to issue a fresh notification providing for 1% reservation/quota for children/grand children of terrorist affected persons/Sikh riots affected persons in all private unaided non-minority Medical/Dental institutions in the State of Punjab and further directed that the said reservation/quota shall apply to management quota seats as well and further directed that the fresh notification shall also provide for a sports quota of 3% in Government Medical/Dental Colleges, the State of Punjab has preferred the present appeals.

2. The facts leading to the present appeals in a nutshell are as under:

The State of Punjab enacted the Punjab Private Health Sciences Educational Institutions (Regulation of Admission, Fixation of fee and making of Reservation) Act, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘2006 Act’) for the regulation of admission, fixation of fee and making of r

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2022 Supreme(SC) 96

M.R.SHAH, B.V.NAGARATHNAState of Punjab – AppellantVersusAnshika Goyal – Respondent

M.R.SHAH, B.V.NAGARATHNA
State of Punjab – Appellant
Versus
Anshika Goyal – Respondent