SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 304

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
(From the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru)
M.R. Shah, B.V. Nagarathna, JJ.
Union of India & Ors. – Appellants
Versus
Shri. C.R. Madhava Murthy & Anr. – Respondents
Civil Appeal Nos. 2087-2088 of 2022
Decided On : 06-04-2022

Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) :Madhavi Divan, ASG Nachiketa Joshi, Mukul Singh, Nidhi Khanna, Mukesh Kumar Maroria, Advocates

IMPORTANT POINT
Removal of pay anomaly by stepping-up pay scale of seniors is justified.

Headnote:

Service Law – Salary – Pay fixation – It cannot be said that original writ petitioners were as such claiming stepping up of pay under ACP Scheme – Their grievance was with respect to anomaly in pay scale and their grievance was that while granting upgradation under ACP Scheme, their juniors were getting higher salaries than what they receive – It was a case of removal of anomaly by stepping up of pay of seniors on promotion drawing a less pay than their juniors – It was a case where a junior was drawing more pay on account of upgradation under ACP Scheme and there was an anomaly and pay of senior was required to be stepped up – High Court has rightly directed appellants herein to step up pay of original writ petitioners keeping in view of pay scale which has been granted to juniors from the date they have started drawing lesser pay than their juniors – No interference of this Court is called for – Appeal dismissed. (Paras 4, 6 and 7)

Facts of the case:

Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned common judgment and order dated 31.07.2021 passed by the High Court of Karnataka in Writ Petition Nos. 3303833039/2016, by which the High Court has allowed the said writ petitions, Union of India and others have preferred the present appeals.

Findings of Court:

High Court has rightly relied and/or considered FR 22 and the order issued by the Government of India on removal of anomaly by stepping up of pay.

Result : Appeals dismissed.

JUDGMENT :

M. R. Shah, J.

1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned common judgment and order dated 31.07.2021 passed by the High Court of Karnataka in Writ Petition Nos. 33038-33039/2016, by which the High Court has allowed the said writ petitions, the Union of India and others have preferred the present appeals.

2. The facts leading to the present appeals in a nutshell are as under :-

2.1 That the respondents herein original writ petitioners were appointed as Lower Division Clerk on 01.02.1973 and 03.08.1973, respectively. Thereafter, they were promoted to the post of Upper Division Clerk on 04.10.1976. That one of the respondents was promoted to officiate as an Inspector w.e.f. 02.04.1981 and the other respondent was promoted to officiate as an Inspector on 13.07.1981. One Shri C.K. Satish was appointed as an Inspector on 17.12.1981 by way of direct recruitment and one Shri B.S. Srikanth was also appointed as an Inspector by way of direct recruitment on 15.05.1982.

In order to provide upgradation to its employees and to remove the stagnation on a particular post, the Union of India introduced “Assured Career Progression Scheme” (ACP Scheme) w.e.f. 09.08.1999. The said Shri C.K. Satish and Shri B.S. Srikanth were granted upgradation under the ACP Scheme. The original writ petitioners were promoted to the post of Superintendent of Central Excise and Customs on 02.07.2000. The employees, juniors to the original writ petitioners were granted upgradation under the ACP Scheme w.e.f. 17.12.2005 and 15.05.2006. However, it so happened that the persons who were placed lower in the upgradation list than the original writ petitioners, on account of upgradation granted to them under the ACP Scheme, started drawing higher pay. Therefore, the original writ petitioners submitted a representation to the Department for stepping up and to remove the anomaly and to fix their salaries at par with their juniors. Thereafter, the original writ petitioners preferred O.A. Nos. 813 & 814/2014 before the Central Administrative Tribunal, Bengaluru Bench, Bengaluru. By the common order dated 04.01.2016, the Tribunal rejected the said applications. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the common order dated 04.01.2016 passed by the Tribunal, the respondents herein preferred the present writ petitions before the High Court. On considering FR 22, which provides for stepping up of pay and the removal of anomaly by stepping up of pay of a senior on promotion drawing lesser pay than his junior, by the impugned common judgment and order the High Court has allowed the writ petitions and has directed the appellants herein to step up the pay of the respondents herein, keeping in view the pay scale which has been granted to the juniors from the date they have started drawing lesser pay than their juniors.

2.2 Feeling aggrieved with the impugned common judgment and order passed by the High Court, the Union of India and others have preferred the present appeals.

3. Ms. Madhvi Divan, learned ASG, appearing on behalf of the appellants has vehemently submitted that while passing the impugned common judgment and order, the High Court has not at all appreciated and/or properly considered the ACP Scheme.

3.1 It is submitted that the respective original writ petitioners were already promoted to the post of Superintendent of Central Excise and Customs. It is submitted that once the respective writ petitioners were already granted the promotion, thereafter, there was no question of granting any stepping up of pay under the ACP Scheme.

3.2 It is submitted that the High Court has not at all appreciated the object and purpose of ACP Scheme. It is submitted that as per the catena of judgments of this Court and various High Courts, the purpose of the ACP Scheme/MACP Scheme is to relieve the frustration on account of stagnation and the Scheme does not involve the actual grant of promotional post to the employees, but to merely monetary benefits in the form of next higher

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top