SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(SC) 411

N. V. RAMANA, KRISHNA MURARI, HIMA KOHLI
P – Appellant
Versus
State Of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) :Mahesh Srivastava, Vaibhav Manu Srivastava, Shikha Khurana, Advocates
For the Respondent(s):Siddharth Luthra, Rajul Shrivastav, Rajneesh Chuni, Charu Ambwani, Advocates

ORDER :

Hima Kohli, J.

1. Leave granted.

2. The present appeal by way of special leave arises from an order dated 16 th November, 2021, passed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court of Judicature for Madhya Pradesh; at Jabalpur in MCRC No. 55343 of 2021, whereby an application filed by the respondent No. 2/accused under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 19731[for short “Cr.P.C.”] has been allowed and he has been granted bail on furnishing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/-(Rupees One Lac only) with a solvent surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial court and certain other conditions imposed therein by the learned Single Judge in connection with Crime No. 39/21 registered on the complaint of the appellant at P.S. Mahila Thana, Jabalpur, State of Madhya Pradesh, for the offences punishable under Sections 376(2)(n) and 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 18602[for short the “IPC”].

3. A brief recapitulation of the facts of the instant case is necessary. The allegations levelled against the respondent No. 2/accused as recorded in FIR dated 21st


Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top