S. RAVINDRA BHAT, ARAVIND KUMAR
Bhagwan Singh – Appellant
Versus
Dilip Kumar @ Deepu @ Depak – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Aravind Kumar, J.
Leave granted.
2. The present appeals by way of special leave arises from the order dated 06.04.2023 passed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court of Judicature at Rajasthan, Jaipur Bench in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No.219 of 2023 whereby the applications filed by the first Respondent in the respective appeals under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1873 (for short the Cr.P.C.) has been allowed and have been granted bail on furnishing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/-(Rupees one lakh only) with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each for their presence in connection with the FIR No.94 of 2022 registered on the complaint of the appellant by Police Station Mandawar, District Dausa, Rajasthan for the offences punishable under Section 376D, 384, 506 of the Indian Penal Code (for short the IPC), Section 326 of POCSO Act and Section 3(2)(v) of The Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short SC/ST Act) and Section 66 of the Information Technology Act, 2000.
Brief Background:
3. The appellant (original complainant) is the uncle of minor girl got registered an FIR No.94 of 2022 on
Kalyan Chandra Sarkar v. Rajesh Ranjan @ Pappu Yadav and another (2004) 7 SCC 528 – Relied [Para 12]
Daulat Ram and others v. State of Haryana
Kashmira Singh v. Duman Singh (1996) 4 SCC 693 – Relied [Para 13]
XXX v. State of Telangana (2018) 16 SCC 511 – Relied [Para 13]
Ram Govind Upadhyay v. Sudarshan Singh
Prashanta Kumar Sarkar v. Ashish Chatterjee and another (2010) 14 SCC 496 – Relied [Para 19]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.