IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Sandeep Sharma
Sonu – Appellant
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh – Respondent
Sandeep Sharma, J
1. Bail petitioner namely Sonu, who is behind bars since 4.9.2022, has approached this court in the instant proceedings filed under S. 483 of Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter, ‘ BNSS ’) for grant of regular bail in case FIR No. 84, dated 3.9.2022 under Ss. 363, 366, 376 and 506 IPC and Ss.4 and 21 of Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, registered at Police Station Talai, District Bilaspur, Himachal Pradesh.
2. Respondent-State has filed status report and Investigating Officer i.e. SI Rakesh Kumar, Police Station Talai, District Bilaspur, Himachal Pradesh has come present with record. Record perused and returned.
3. In nutshell, prosecution case is that on 3.9.2022, father of victim-prosecutrix lodged a complaint with the police that his minor daughter XYZ has gone missing. He alleged that his minor daughter, aged 16 years, has not returned home since the evening of 2.9.2022 and he has apprehension that some unknown person has made her elope with him, as such, appropriate action in accordance with be taken. After receipt of aforesaid complaint, police lodged FIR, as detailed herein above and started investigation. Bail petit
Alakh Alok Srivastava v. Union of India
Shaheen Welfare Assn . v. Union of India
Jagjeet Singh v. Ashish Mishra
Hussainara Khatoon v. Home Secy. the State of Bihar reported in
Kadra Pahadiya & Ors . v. State of Bihar reported in
Satender Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation
Jalaluddin Khan v. Union of India
Ramkripal Meena v. Directorate of Enforcement
Umarmia Alias Mamumia v. State of Gujarat
Paramjit Singh v. State (NCT of Delhi),
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.