RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
Anantha Satya Udaya Bhaskara Rao @ Anantha Babu – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER
Ravi Cheemalapati, J.—This Criminal Petition is filed under Sections 437 & 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ( for short, ‘Cr.P.C.’), seeking bail, by the petitioner/sole accused in Cr.No.195 of 2022 of Sarpavaram Police Station, Kakinada, initially registered under Section 174 CrPC, later altered to the offence punishable under Sections 302, 201 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code (for short, ‘IPC’) and Sections 3(1)(r)(s) and Section 3(2)(v) of S.Cs. & S.Ts. (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 as amended by Act 1 of 2016 (for short, ‘the Act’).
2. The case of the prosecution, in brief, is that, the deceased worked as a driver of the accused for about six (06) years and at the time of his marriage, the deceased borrowed an amount of Rs.50,000/- from the accused and repaid Rs.30,000/- leaving a balance amount of Rs.20,000/- and about three months back the deceased discontinued to work at the accused. Since then, the accused was pressurizing the deceased for repayment of balance amount and on the night of 19.05.2022, the accused contacted the father of the deceased over phone and warned the deceased severely to see his end, if the amount is not paid. Later, when
Sanjay Chandra vs. Central Bureau of Investigation
Seema Singh vs. Central Bureau of Investigation
Anil Kumar Yadav vs. State (NCT of Delhi) and another
Sunil Kumar vs. State of Bihar and another
Sudha Singh vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and another
Virupakshappa Gouda and another vs. State of Karnataka and another
Prasanta Kumar Sarkar vs. Ashis Chatterjee and another
Pratapbhai Hamirbhai Solanki vs. State of Gujarat and another
(1) Bail – Object of bail is neither punitive nor preventative – Deprivation of liberty must be considered a punishment, unless it is required to ensure that accused person will stand his trial when ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the grant of bail depends on various factors, including the nature of the offence, the presumption of innocence, and the need for a humane att....
Bail denied in murder case due to criminal antecedents including proclaimed offender status and conviction, eyewitness assault evidence, blood findings, offence gravity, and absconding risk; arrest g....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the grant of bail is the general rule and putting a person in jail is an exception. The court emphasized the presumption of innocence and the ....
The gravity and seriousness of the offence are crucial factors in deciding bail applications.
The court emphasized the seriousness of the accusations, the continuing nature of the conspiracy, and the likelihood of the accused influencing witnesses and interfering with the investigation in rej....
Bail denied in heinous POCSO offence involving minor rape due to prima facie case, accused's absconding history risking flight, and no undue trial delay despite charge-sheet and witness examination.
Gravity alone cannot be a decisive ground to deny bail, rather competing factors are required to be balanced by court while exercising its discretion.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.