A. S. BOPANNA, SUDHANSHU DHULIA
Raj Reddy Kallem – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Leave granted.
2. The brief facts leading to this appeal are that in the year 2012 Respondent No. 2-complainant placed a purchase order for the supply of “Promotec Fiber Laser Cutting Machine” to the company (M/s Farmax) of the appellant. For the said purchase, an advance amount of Rs. 1,55,00,000 was paid to the company of the appellant. All the same, for some reasons, M/s Farmax failed to procure and supply this machine to respondent No. 2-complainant. Thereafter, the appellant issued 5 cheques to the complainant towards return of the advance money. Admittedly, some of these cheques were dishonoured and in Nov-Dec 2013 the complainant initiated proceedings under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (hereinafter referred to as “NI Act”). Additionally, in January 2014 complainant filed a complaint under Section 156(3) of Criminal Procedure Code (hereinafter referred to as ‘Cr.P.C.’) which led to an FIR No. 35 of 2014 at Police Station Mahesh Nagar (Ambala) under Sections 406, 420 and 120B of Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as ‘IPC’) against the appellant, wherein it was said that the appellant had wrongfully retained the hard-earned money of the complai
Damodar S. Prabhu vs. Sayed Babalal H. (2010) 5 SCC 663 [Para 11] – Relied.
K.M Ibrahim vs. K.P. Mohammed and Another
O.P. Dholakia vs. State of Haryana and Another
JIK Industries Limited and Others vs. Amarlal V. Jamuni and Another
Meters and Instruments private Ltd. and Another vs. Kanchan Mehta
In Re: Expeditious Trial of Cases Under Section 138 of NI Act, 1881
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.