SANJIV KHANNA, SANJAY KUMAR, R. MAHADEVAN
State Of Karnataka – Appellant
Versus
Chandrasha – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
R.MAHADEVAN, J.
1. At the outset, it would be apposite to point out the observation of this Court in Swatantar Singh v. State of Haryana, (1997) 4 SCC 14 : 1997 SCC (L&S) 909 (SCC p. 17, para 6), which reads as under:
2. This is an appeal filed by the State against the final Judgment and Order dated 16.02.2022 passed by the High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench2[Hereinafter shortly referred to as “the High Court”] in Criminal Appeal No.200105 of 2015.
3. By the impugned Judgment, the High Court set aside the order of conviction dated 13.10.2015 passed by the Principal Sessions Judge, Kalaburagi3[Hereinafter
Swatantar Singh v. State of Haryana
Krishna Ram v. State of Rajasthan 2009 (2) Crimes 337 [Para 9.6] – Relied.
A.Subair v. State of Kerala (2009) 6 SCC 587 [Para 13] – Relied.
B.Jayaraj v. State of A.P. (2014) 13 SCC 55 : (2014) 5 SCC (Cri) 543 [Para 14] – Relied.
Illegal gratification – Section 20 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 would come into operation only when there is no nexus between demand and action performed – But, when fact of receipt of payme....
Requirement to prove demand and acceptance of illegal gratification under the Prevention of Corruption Act is critical for conviction; mere recovery of money is insufficient.
The prosecution must prove both the demand and acceptance of illegal gratification to substantiate a conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act; mere recovery of bribe money without proven dem....
Illegal gratification – Allegation of demand of gratification and acceptance made by a public servant has to be established beyond reasonable doubt – Mere possession or recovery of currency notes is ....
Both demand and acceptance of illegal gratification are required for a conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act; mere acceptance of bribe without proven demand fails to establish culpability....
The proof of demand of illegal gratification is essential to establish offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act. Mere recovery of tainted money is not sufficient without evidence of demand and....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.