SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(SC) 1088

SANJIV KHANNA, SANJAY KUMAR, R. MAHADEVAN
State Of Karnataka – Appellant
Versus
Chandrasha – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) : Mr. D. L. Chidananda, AOR
For the Respondent(s): Mr. Anirudh Sanganeria, AOR

JUDGMENT :

R.MAHADEVAN, J.

1. At the outset, it would be apposite to point out the observation of this Court in Swatantar Singh v. State of Haryana, (1997) 4 SCC 14 : 1997 SCC (L&S) 909 (SCC p. 17, para 6), which reads as under:

    “6….. Corruption is corroding, like cancerous lymph nodes, the vital veins of the body politic, social fabric of efficiency in the public service and demoralizing the honest officers. The efficiency in public service would improve only when the public servant devotes his sincere attention and does the duty diligently, truthfully, honestly and devotes himself assiduously to the performance of the duties of his post. The reputation of being corrupt would gather thick and unchaseable clouds around the conduct of the officer and gain notoriety much faster than the smoke.”

2. This is an appeal filed by the State against the final Judgment and Order dated 16.02.2022 passed by the High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench2[Hereinafter shortly referred to as “the High Court”] in Criminal Appeal No.200105 of 2015.

3. By the impugned Judgment, the High Court set aside the order of conviction dated 13.10.2015 passed by the Principal Sessions Judge, Kalaburagi3[Hereinafter

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top