SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(SC) 479

SANDEEP MEHTA, PRASANNA B. VARALE
Lok Mal @ Loku – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Appellant(s) : Mr. Shekhar G Devasa, Sr.Adv. M/S. Devasa & Co., AOR Mr. Manish Tiwari, Adv. Ms. Thashmitha Km, Adv. Mr. Shashi Bhushan Nagar, Adv. Mr. Aryan Pandey, Adv.
For the Respondent(s): Mr. K. Parameshwar, A.A.G. Mr. Rajeev Kumar Dubey, Adv. Mr. Ashiwan Mishra, Adv. Mr. Kamlendra Mishra, AOR

Judgement Key Points

What is the evidentiary value of the prosecutrix's testimony in a rape case and whether conviction can be based on sole testimony? What is the impact of absence of injuries on the private parts of the victim on the prosecution’s case in rape? What considerations govern the delay in lodging a report/FIR and its effect on the prosecution in rape cases?

Key Points: - The prosecutrix’s testimony in a rape case is of the same value as an injured witness and can sustain a conviction on sole testimony. (!) (!) - Absence of injuries on the victim’s private parts is not necessarily fatal to the prosecution; it depends on the facts and circumstances of the case. (!) - Delay in lodging complaints and registering FIR can be explained and is not automatically fatal to the prosecution’s case. (!) - The court reaffirmed that the prosecutrix’s testimony, if trustworthy and unshaken, can form the basis of conviction without corroboration. (!) (!) - The appellant’s defense of false implication and character attacks on the prosecutrix’s mother were not accepted; the conviction was affirmed. (!) (!) - The judgment directs remission consideration for the accused in accordance with state policy within four weeks due to the age of the incident. (!)

What is the evidentiary value of the prosecutrix's testimony in a rape case and whether conviction can be based on sole testimony?

What is the impact of absence of injuries on the private parts of the victim on the prosecution’s case in rape?

What considerations govern the delay in lodging a report/FIR and its effect on the prosecution in rape cases?


JUDGMENT :

PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.

1. The present criminal appeal arises out of a judgment and order dated 22nd July 2010 passed by High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench in Crl. Appeal No. 496 of 1986. By the impugned judgment and order, the conviction which was rendered by the trial court under Section 376, 323 Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter being referred to as ‘IPC’) was affirmed by the High Court and a sentence of 5 years rigorous imprisonment under Section 376 IPC and 6 months rigorous imprisonment under Section 323 IPC imposed by the trial court was confirmed.

BRIEF FACTS

2. The factual matrix of the case is that on 19.03.1984 at 9.30 A.M, the prosecutrix went to take tuition classes for the girls at the house of the accused. It was stated that out of the two girls. One went to the bathroom and the other was sent by the accused for bringing water. It was further stated that when she was engaged in the work on the first floor of the house, the accused entered the room and latched the door from inside and forced her on the bed. The prosecutrix tried to raise an alarm but her mouth was gagged with a piece of cloth. The accused then removed her salwar to make he

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top