SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Bom) 1208

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
M.S.SONAK, JITENDRA JAIN
Hanumant Jagganath Nazirkar – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellants : Manoj Mohite, Pranav Pokale, Priyanka Chavan, Aditya Bagal, Chinmay Sawant
For the Respondent: S.V. Gavand

Judgement Key Points

How to determine the start of arrest for Article 22(2) and Cr.P.C. Section 57 in pre-arrest medical examination cases? What is the rule regarding exclusion of time for pre-arrest medical examination in computing the 24-hour production deadline? What are the constitutional and procedural requirements for production before a Magistrate within 24 hours and the consequences of non-compliance?

Key Points: - 1. The court held that arrest commences when the individual is taken into custody and restraint on liberty begins, not when formally recorded; production within 24 hours is required. (!) (!) (!) - 2. Time for pre-arrest medical examination cannot be excluded from the 24-hour period absent a statutory provision; only time for journey to the Magistrate’s Court is excluded. (!) (!) (!) - 3. If production before the Magistrate occurs after 24 hours from arrest, the arrest is illegal and requires release; videoconferencing or hospital visits to satisfy production may be considered but are not mandated by statute. (!) (!) (!) - 4. Pre-arrest custody and medical procedures do not override the constitutional mandate under Article 21 and 22; the police cannot justify delays by pre-arrest medical examination. (!) (!) - 5. The court awarded relief, releasing the petitioner on bail with conditions, and directed investigation into related cash transactions; references to related precedents and analogous cases cited. (!) (!)

How to determine the start of arrest for Article 22(2) and Cr.P.C. Section 57 in pre-arrest medical examination cases?

What is the rule regarding exclusion of time for pre-arrest medical examination in computing the 24-hour production deadline?

What are the constitutional and procedural requirements for production before a Magistrate within 24 hours and the consequences of non-compliance?


JUDGMENT :

Jitendra Jain, J.

1. Rule. By consent and since pleadings are complete, same is taken for final hearing at the stage of admission itself.

2. This petition, under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C) is filed for issuing writ of Habeas Corpus to declare the arrest of the Petitioner in C.R. No.128/2024, registered with Baramati Taluka Police Station, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) to be illegal. The Petitioner in the present petition has also challenged the remand orders dated 27 October 2024 and 2 November 2024.

Brief facts:-

(i) On 5 March 2023, a complaint was lodged against the Petitioner, his wife and other persons alleging cheating, forgery, and dishonestly obtaining an amount of Rs.3,37,30,000/-. The Anticipatory Bail Application filed by the Petitioner before this Court was rejected on 8 August 2023 and in the meanwhile chargesheet was filed by the Police. The challenge by the Petitioner to the rejection of anticipatory bail was dismissed by the Supreme Court on 25 August 2023.

(ii) On 25 October 2024, a search was conducted of the Petitioner by th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top