VIKRAMAJIT SEN
MAHA SINGH – Appellant
Versus
ANAND SINGH MANN – Respondent
( 1 ) BY these Orders I shall decide two Objections that have arisen touching upon the maintainability of the suit. Mr. Rana, learned counsel appearing for the Plaintiff has placed reliance on the following judgments such as AIR 1936 Patna, 231, AIR 1956 Hyderabad 118, AIR 1932 allahabad 485, AIR 1926 Rangoon 71, AIR 1975 SC 1810, AIR 1967 SC 436, AIR 1977 Karnataka 173, AIR 1930 Allahabad 446, AIR 1954 Madras 83, AIR 1977 SC 1823, AIR 1981 Bombay 188, (1908) 35 Cal. 551, AIR 1929 Cal. 588, AIR 1968 SC 534, AIR 1971 MP 172, AIR 1950 Privy Council 68, 1994 (1) CCC 94, 1998 (8) SCC 623, AIR 1988 Allahabad 303, 1994 (4) SCC 396, 59 (1995) DLT 667, 1981 (2) RLR 278, AIR 1979 MP 153, 1987 RLR 262, AIR 1987 Delhi 165, AIR 1995 AP 423, AIR 1992 Delhi 118, 67 (1997) DLT 576, AIR 1980 Punjab and Haryana 25, AIR 1956 punjab 230, AIR 1960 AD 535, 1992 DLT 530, AIR 1960 SC 335, AIR 1982 Delhi 520, AIR 1904 SC 497, 1971 (1) SCC 597, AIR 1991 J and K 1, 1997 (III) AD Delhi 626, 1991 (3) Delhi Lawyer 350, 1991 RLR 239, 1998 (44) DRJ 502, AIR 2000 Delhi 92, 2004 (1) AD (SC) 406.
( 2 ) I shall restrict discussions to Sanjay Kaushish v. Kaushish and Others, air 1992 Delhi 118, sin
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.