SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Del) 2320

SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA
UNIVERSITY OF DELHI – Appellant
Versus
SURESH CHAND – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.S.RUPAL, Mohinder, RASHMI RAI, SURYAKANT SINGLA


SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA, J.

( 1 ) BY this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the validity of award dated 17th October, 2003, passed by learned Labour Court, Delhi.

( 2 ) BRIEFLY, the facts relevant for purposes of deciding this writ petition are that the the respondent was working as a chowkidar with the petitioner with effect from 25th March, 1983. Due to his frequent absenting from duty for long periods without any permission, he was given adverse entries in his Confidential Report for the years 1989, 1990 , 1991 and 1992. He was also issued memo for remaining absented from work without any intimation and without any prior permission on 22. 2. 1991, 16. 6. 1991, 5. 4. 1991, 11. 2. 1992, 24. 2. 1992, 13. 4. 1992, 11. 5. 1992, 11. 6. 1992, 07. 4. 1994, 17. 11. 1994, 24. 10. 1995 and 6. 3. 1995.

( 3 ) THE respondent did not turn up for duty from 10th April, 1995 onwards and did not make any leave application or sent any intimation about the reasons for his absence for duty. The respondent was absenting from duty with effect from 10th April, 1995. The petitioner sent memos to the respondent about his unauthorized absence and calling upon him to join duty dated 28. 4. 1995,











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top