Back
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
Geeta Tandon – Appellant
Versus
Sunil Gomber – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the plaintiff's claim for property partition. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. background ownership of the suit property. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. defendants' objections regarding the plaintiff's claims. (Para 6 , 7 , 10) |
| 4. claims related to alleged mental health of the testator. (Para 8 , 9 , 11) |
| 5. questions surrounding validity of the wills. (Para 12 , 14 , 15 , 20 , 23) |
| 6. legal rights of heirs under hindu succession act. (Para 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 7. final ruling on plaintiff's claims and distribution of the estate. (Para 159 , 160) |
JUDGMENT
Neena Bansal Krishna, J.
1. Plaintiff has sought partition in respect of the property bearing no. F- 3, Vijay Nagar, near Delhi University, Delhi 110009 consisting of two and half Floors on a plot of land measuring 200 sq. yards (hereinafter referred to as "the suit property"), from defendant no. 1 and 2, her brothers.
2. The plaintiff's grandfather late Shri Jai Gopal Gomber, on partition came to India in the year 1947/1948 and purchased the suit property vide the Purchase Agreement dated 02.04.1959 and became the absolute, legal and registered owner of the suit property. A Conveyance Deed was executed in his favour on 31.07.1969.Shri Jai Gopal Gomber a
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
