SANDEEP V. MARNE
Dattatray Gopal Mhatre – Appellant
Versus
Neerabai Tukaram Mhatre – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. The Second Appeal is filed against concurrent findings of the Trial Court and the first Appellate Court decreeing Plaintiff’s suit for declaration of ownership and possession of suit property. The appeal challenges Judgment and Decree dated 07 December 2022 passed by District Judge-III, Raigad at Alibaug in Civil Appeal No. 64 of 2010 thereby confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 23 April 2010 passed by the 3rd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Alibaug in Regular Civil Suit No. 170 of 2005.
2. Briefly stated, facts of the case are that, one Hiru Gopal Mhatre was the owner of various properties and after his demise, his two sons Krishna Hiru Mhatre and Narayan Hiru Mhatre inherited them. By way of Mutation Entry No.1779 effected on 01 May 1969, a partition was recorded between the two sons-Krishna and Narayan, in which the lands bearing Gat Nos. 654, 673, 680 and 721 came to the share of Narayan Mhatre. He purchased properties bearing Gat Nos. 653 and 678 as a tenant under provisions of Sections 32-G of the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. Narayan also purchased land bearing Gat No. 829 by Sale deed dated 07 June 1943.
3. Out of the lands owned b
Kavita Kanwar Vs. Pamela Mehta and others (2021) 11 SCC 209
P. D. Navghare and another Vs. S. D. Chachad and others 2011 (1) Mh.L.J. 509
Rajkumari and others Vs. Surinder Pal Sharma (2021) 14 SCC 500
Surender Pal and Others Vs. Dr. (Mrs.) Saraswati Arora and another (1974) 2 SCC 600
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.