Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SANJIV KHANNA
M.L. Meena – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
ORDER
1. I have examined the report/order sheet of the vigilance section relied upon by the counsel for the petitioner. The report/order sheet was probably prepared in the year 1996. The report states that a complaint was received from one Mr. R.K. Singh of Noida, making allegations that the complainant-petitioner herein, while working as ADG, G.M.S.D., Delhi, had favoured one Mr. Hans Raj and his company/associates and had made purchases at higher costs without issuing tender inquiries.
2. The report/order sheet records the allegations in the complaint as under:
1. "Shri Meena favours one Mr. Hansraj and his companies/associates e.g. he is promoting the interest of firm M/s Harjeet Enterprises, which is distributor of companies of Mr. Hansraj, Shri. Meena purchases bracketed items for CGHS at higher costs without issuing tender inquiries. He is purchasing product of his favour i.e. companies (e.g. Richimol, Richimox) by misrepresenting the facts.
2. He is passing the current bills of his favourite companies where bill worth Rs. 25 crores are pending in the depot.
3. The stores of favorite parties of Shri. Meena are being issued first so as to go more order in their favour.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
