SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
P.K.BHASIN
Karam Chand – Appellant
Versus
Harwinder Singh – Respondent


ORDER

P.K. Bhasin, J. On receipt of a money decree dated 28th September, 2010 passed by the High Court of Himachal Pradesh in Suit No. 37/2005, "Karam Chand vs Harwinder Singh" and sent by that Court to this Court in exercise of the powers under Order XX1 Rule 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure (`C.P.C.' in short) for execution by this Court one Company by the name of M/s Cutting Edge Infrastructure Private Limited (hereinafter to be referred as the `the objector') immediately moved the present objection petition under Order XXI Rule 58 C.P.C. It is alleged in this objection petition that one of the two properties in Delhi which are sought to be attached and sold in execution of the decree against the judgment debtor i.e. house no.B-5/96, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi has been purchased by it from M/s Anant Raj Agencies Ltd., which Company had purchased it from the judgment debtor/owner through a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell executed by the judgment debtor in its favour in the year 2003 and in execution the decree passed in that suit sale deed was executed in favour of the said Company on 3rd December,2009. Thereafter, the said Company sold the same to the o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top