Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Rajiv Shakdher, J.
Sheel International Ltd. - Appellant
Versus
Shree Anu Milk Products Ltd. - Respondent
O.M.P. 591 of 2013
Decided On : 07-08-2013
JUDGMENT
IA No. 12436/2013 (O. 23 R. 3 of CPC)
1. This a joint application filed under Order 23 Rule 3 read with Section 151 of the CPC. It is prayed by the counsels for the parties that the petition be decreed in terms of the compromise set out in the captioned application. The parties have adverted to the terms of compromise in paragraph 2(a) to 2(r) of the captioned application. The terms of compromise are also separately provided in a settlement agreement dated 24.07.2013, which is marked as Exhibit ?X?.
2. The captioned application is also accompanied by affidavits of the authorized representatives of the parties. On behalf of the petitioner, the affidavit has been sworn by Mr Nitin Maheshwari, who is the whole time director of the petitioner company, while on behalf of the respondent, the affidavit is sworn by Mr Hemraj, s/o Mr Mahaveer Prasad Jain, who is said to be the director of the respondent company. The application bears the signatures of the said authorised representatives as also the counsel for the petitioner. Though the application has not been signed by the counsel for the respondent, since he is present in court, he says that he has instructions to sign the application. Accordingly, the learned counsel for the respondent is permitted to do the same.
3. To be noted the settlement agreement (Ex. ?X?) bears the signatures of all directors of the petitioner and respondent company. The signatures of the authorized representatives and the directors are identified by their respective counsels.
4. I have perused the terms of compromise. According to me, the same are lawful. Accordingly, the application is allowed. OMP no. 591/2013 is disposed of in terms of compromise recorded in the captioned application and the settlement agreement (Ex. ?X?).
OMP No. 591/2013
5. In view of the orders passed above, no further orders are called for.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of the settlement between the parties, the waiver of the right to seek re-employment by the workmen, and the entitlement of the ....
A lockout is justified if it is declared in response to an illegal strike or a strike that is in breach of a settlement or award.
The combination of eyewitness testimonies, recovery of the weapon used, and forensic examination results can establish guilt in criminal cases, even based on circumstantial evidence.
The conviction of an accused person under Section 27(3) of the Arms Act is not permissible in law if the accused is also charged with committing murder under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code.
The court can enhance compensation based on the deceased's income and family dependency, and adjust the multiplier used by the Tribunal if found unjustified.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
