SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
VALMIKI J.MEHTA
Shakeel Ahmed – Appellant
Versus
Syed Akhlaq Hussain – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Valmiki J. Mehta, J. (Oral)--This Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) is filed by the defendant in the suit impugning the Judgment of the Trial Court dated 5.3.2013 by which the trial court has decreed the suit for possession and mesne profits filed by the respondent/plaintiff with respect to the suit property comprising of ground floor and first floor of property bearing no. J-67/2, Thokar no. 4, Abdul Fazal Enclave, Part-I, Okhla, New Delhi on plot of 62 sq. yds. (hereinafter referred to as `the suit property').

2. The case set up by the respondent/plaintiff was that he purchased the suit property from one Laiq Ahmed in terms of documentation dated 20.2.2008 being the Agreement to Sell (Ex. PW1/F), Affidavit (Ex. PW1/H), General Power Attorney (Ex. PW1/G), Will (Ex. PW1/I), Receipt (PW1/J) etc. The seller Laiq Ahmed has purchased the suit property from the earlier owner Islauddin Safi and who was the owner of the suit property in terms of General Power of Attorney (Ex. PW3/1) and Special Power of Attorney (Ex. PW3/2). Appellant/defendant is the brother of Laiq Ahmed, and from whom Laiq Ahmed, the respondent/plaintiff has pur

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top