SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
D.N.PATEL, C.HARI SHANKAR
Cynorlmpex – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner of Customs (Export) – Respondent


Table of Content
1. non-service of order preventing appeal. (Para 1)
2. arguments regarding service and limitation. (Para 2 , 3)
3. court's directive to supply order copy. (Para 4)
4. writ petition disposed. (Para 5)

ORDER

D.N. Patel, Chief Justice (Oral)

CM No. 48211/2019 (exemption)

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

The applications are disposed of.

W.P.(C) 11741/2019

1. The grievance ventilated in this petition is about non-serving of the order in original bearing no. 55/2019 dated 5th March, 2019 passed by the Additional Commissioner of Customs, ICD, New Delhi to the petitioner herein.

2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that despite the aforesaid order in original was passed by the Additional Commissioner of Customs, ICD, New Delhi, way back on 5th March, 2019 but the copy thereof has not been served to this petitioner so far and therefore they are unable to prefer an appeal against the aforesaid order.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that the authorized representative of this petitioner namely Mr. Raj Kumar has made a statement under Section 108 of the Customs Act, 1962 before the customs authority. Hence, the orig

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top