Delhivery Private Limited vs Treasure Vase Ventures Private Limited

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
V.KAMESWAR RAO
Delhivery Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Treasure Vase Ventures Private Limited – Respondent

Table of Content
1. facts regarding the plaintiff's trademark usage and history. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. arguments presented by both parties regarding trademark rights. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51)
3. court's observations and analysis of trademark validity and usage. (Para 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79)
4. conclusion to vacate the interim injunction. (Para 80)

JUDGMENT

V. Kameswar Rao, J.

I.A. 5109/2020 (filed by plaintiff under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC) & I.A. 6523/2020 (by defendant under Order 39 Rule 4 r/w Section 151 CPC to vacate/set aside ex-parte order dated July 03, 2020)

1. By this order I shall decide I.A. 5109/2020 filed by the plaintiff under Order XXXIX Rule 1 & 2 and I.A. 6523/2020 under Order XXXIX Rule 4 (`O39 R4' for short) read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (`CPC' for short) filed by defendant.

2. The case of the plaintiff in th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTV.KAMESWAR RAODelhivery Private Limited – AppellantVersusTreasure Vase Ventures Private Limited – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
V.KAMESWAR RAO
Delhivery Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Treasure Vase Ventures Private Limited – Respondent