Arrena Overseas Private Limited vs Batra Art Press

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
AMIT BANSAL
Arrena Overseas Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Batra Art Press – Respondent

Table of Content
1. family structure and ownership of the suit property. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. arguments concerning ownership and validity of lease. (Para 7 , 11)
3. court's view on the admission of landlord-tenant relationship. (Para 12 , 14 , 18 , 19)
4. assessment of the lease agreement and validity factors. (Para 13 , 15 , 17 , 26)
5. decision on the application under order xii rule 6. (Para 31 , 32)

JUDGMENT

Amit Bansal, J.

I.A. 721/2018 (O-XIIIA R-2 r.w. O-XII R-6 of CPC)

1. By way of the present judgment, I shall dispose of the application filed on behalf of the plaintiff under Order XII R-6 read with Order XIIIA of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) seeking relief of possession. Notice in this application was issued on 19th January, 2018 and reply has been filed on behalf of the defendant. Both sides have also filed written submissions along with judgments in support.

2. To appreciate the controversy in the suit, it may be useful to refer to the family structure of late Sh. Sanmukh Singh Batra. Late Sh. Sanmukh Singh Batra had two sons, namely Jaspal Singh Batra and Ravinder Pal Singh Batra. Jaspal Singh Batra has three sons, viz. Harjot Batra, Jaspreet Singh Batra

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTAMIT BANSALArrena Overseas Private Limited – AppellantVersusBatra Art Press – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
AMIT BANSAL
Arrena Overseas Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Batra Art Press – Respondent