N.V.ANJARIA
PATEL RAMESHBHAI DAHYABHAI – Appellant
Versus
PATEL PRANAV KIRITBAHI – Respondent
The appellant is the original plaintiff. His suit for specific performance was partly allowed by the trial court which held that the plaintiff was entitled to get Rs. 02,62,500/-with 6% interest. The plaintiff's prayer for specific performance was rejected. Aggrieved by the said part, he filed Regular Civil Appeal No.252 of 2006 which also came to be dismissed.
2. The appellant-plaintiff has therefore preferred this Second Appeal before this Court under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
3. By instituting Special Civil Suit No. 27 of 1991 before the Court of Civil Judge (S.D.), Anand, the plaintiff contended that property being Final Plot No.677, Town Planning Scheme No.2, Anand, admeasuring 1789 Sq. Meters, belonging to deceased Chhaganbhai was agreed to be sold to the plaintiff by said Chhaganbhai and that there was an oral contract for that. Said Chhaganbhai was grandfather of defendant Nos.1 and 2 and was father-in-law of defendant No.3. The defendants are the heirs. Chhaganbhai died in the year 1985. It was the case of the plaintiff that he was staying at Dubai since long, that he had family relationship with said Chhaganbhai. When he happened to be in Ind
Nahar Singh Vs. Harnak Singh and others [(1996) 6 SCC 699]
Jupadi Kesava Rao Vs. Pulavarthi Venkata Subbarao and others [AIR 1971 SC 1070]
Mayawanti Vs. Kaushalya Devi [(1990) 3 SCC 1]
Damcherla Anjaneyulu and another Vs Damcherla Venkata Seshaiah and another [AIR 1987 SC 1641]
Naranji Makanji Vs Bhagwanji Makanji Patel and another [1993(2) GLR 1444]
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.