SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2013 Supreme(Gau) 6

B.P.KATAKEY, A.K.GOSWAMI, UJJAL BHUYAN
State of Assam – Appellant
Versus
Moslem Mondal – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared
For Appellant/Petitioner/Plaintiff: Nagendra Rai, Mr. A.C. Buragohain, Mr. B. Gogoi, Mr. M.A. Sheikh, Ms. A. Begum, Mr. S.H. Rahman, Mr. R. Ali, Mr. N.N. Ahmed, Mr. M.H. Ahmed, Mr. N. Sultana, Mr. M.A. Sheikh, Mr. A. Begum, Mr. K.U. Ahmed, Mr. M.H. Choudhury, Mr. H. Hussain, Mr. J. Abedin, Mr. F.U. Borbhuya, Mr. A. Matin, Mr. A.H.M.R. Choudhury, Mr. A. Choudhury, Mr. S. Islam, Mr. F.K.R. Ahmed, Mr. A.B. Choudhury, Mr. S.A. Choudhury, Mr. G. Dutta, Mr. B. Islam, Mr. A. Haque, Mr. M.U. Mahmud, Mr. B. Islam, Mr. S.A. Mondal, Mr. S. Hoque, Mr. B. Islam, Mr. A. Haque, Mr. A. Hussain, Mr. M.U. Mahmud, Mr. A.T. Sarkar, Mr. M.I. Hussain and Mr. S. Hoque
For Respondents/Defendant: Mr. R. Sachar, Mr. B.C. Das, Mr. D.N. Bhattacharjee, Mr. J. Mollah, Mr. S. Islam, Mr. A. Bhanu, Mr. N. Dutta, Mr. S. Shyam, Mr. M.U. Mahmud, Mr. M. Khan, Mr. A. Saikia, Mr. A.T. Sarkar, Mr. S.K. Roy, Mr. M.I. Hussain, Mr. A.C. Buragohain, Mr. R. Sharma, Mr. A.C. Buragohain, Mr. B.J. Talukar, Mr. B. Goyal and Mr. R. Sharma

JUDGMENT

B.P. Katkey, J.

1. The State of Assam, represented by the Commissioner & Secretary, Home Department, as well as the Superintendent of Police, Barpeta, have filed the Review Petition No. 22/2010 seeking review of the judgment and order dated 01.02.2010 passed by a Division Bench of this Court in Writ Appeal No. 238/2008, Moslem Mondal & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors., reported in 2010 (2) GLT 1, on the grounds set forth in the review petition. On 28.04.2010 when the review petition was taken up for consideration by a Division Bench, a prayer was made by the learned counsel appearing for the appellants in W.A. No. 238/2008 to hear all the learned counsel appearing for the parties in the appeal including amicus curiae assisting the Court and to hear the review petition along with other matters, which was accepted by the Court. Vide order dated 17.05.2010, while issuing notice in the review petition, the aforesaid Division Bench consisting of the Hon'ble the then Chief Justice and the Hon'ble Judge, who was one of the members of the Division Bench which decided the W.A. No. 238/2008, referred the matter to a Full Bench considering the "importance of the issue involved in the matt

























































































































































































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top