IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
N. NAGARESH, J.
NIBU KASIM C/O M/S POLYNOVA INDUSTRIES – Petitioner
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
W.P. (C) Nos. 23089, 24165 of 2022
Decided On : 10-01-2023
Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 21 and 19 - Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 - Section 23 and 25 - Proprietor - Production of non-woven bags - List of prohibited items - According to petitioners, non-woven bags are manufactured using food grade granules - Non-woven bag is a food grade item approved by many Government agencies and recognised by Ministry of Textiles - Petitioners are manufacturing non-woven bags out of Polypropylene and Calcium Carbonate - Polypropylene is a food grade granule and Calcium Carbonate is a natural product and 100% biodegradable under natural process - Petitioners state that Government as per GO dated constituted an Expert Committee to study and report on usage of plastic in Kerala - Expert Committee reported that plastic litter alone is pollution problem - Report mentioned Polypropylene bags as product proposed to be regulated with return deposit refund scheme - Expert Committee has reported that non-woven fabric is made from fibre grade textile polymers and propylene and that non-woven fabrics are 100% usable and reusable - This is a power given by the Rules to State Boards alone. Circular dated issued by Chairman of the Kerala State Pollution Control Board does not specify any reason for imposing a more stringent standard in matter of non-woven bags - Kerala State Pollution Control Board has issued the Circular dated solely based on GOs dated - In absence of sufficient reasons to prescribe a more stringent standard for non-woven bags, Circular dated cannot stand the scrutiny of law.
Findings of the Court:
It is true that proviso to Rule 3(3A)(i) of Rules, 1986 provides that the State Boards may specify more stringent standards for relevant parameters with respect to specific industry or location after recording reasons therefor in writing - This is a power given by Rules to State Boards alone - Circular dated issued by Chairman of Kerala State Pollution Control Board does not specify any reason for imposing a more stringent standard in the matter of non-woven bags - Kerala State Pollution Control Board has issued Circular dated solely based on GOs dated - In absence of sufficient reasons to prescribe a more stringent standard for non-woven bags, Circular dated cannot stand the scrutiny of law - In facts and circumstances of case, Court find that inclusion of non-woven bags in list of banned single use plastic items by Government Orders without regard to the GSM standards and in violation of provisions of Plastic Waste Management Rules, 2016 is highly illegal and arbitrary - Consequently, Government Orders dated as also Circular dated.
Result: Writ Petitions are disposed of.
JUDGMENT :
N. NAGARESH, J.
1. Petitioners in W.P. (C) No. 23089/2022 are members of registered association of the manufacturers of non-woven bags in Kerala. The petitioner in W.P. (C) No. 24165/2022 is a Proprietor engaged in the production of non-woven bags. The petitioners are before this Court aggrieved by GO (MS) dated 17.12.2019 and GO (MS) dated 27.01.2020 whereby the 2nd respondent has included the non-woven bags in the list of prohibited items.
2. According to the petitioners, non-woven bags are manufactured using food grade granules. Non-woven bag is a food grade item approved by many Government agencies and recognised by the Ministry of Textiles. The petitioners are manufacturing non-woven bags out of Polypropylene and Calcium Carbonate. Polypropylene is a food grade granule and Calcium Carbonate is a natural product and 100% biodegradable under natural process.
3. The petitioners state that the Government as per GO dated 12.12.2018 constituted an Expert Committee to study and report on the usage of plastic in Kerala. The Expert Committee reported that plastic litter alone is the pollution problem. The report mentioned the Polypropylene bags as product proposed to be regulated with return deposit refund scheme. The Expert Committee has reported that the non-woven fabric is made from fibre grade textile polymers and propylene and that non-woven fabrics are 100% usable and reusable.
4. The petitioners state that the Government of India, in exercise of its powers under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, has formulated the Plastic Waste Management Rules, 2016. The Rules provide that non-woven plastic carry bags shall not be less than 60 gram per square metre (GSM) with effect from 30.09.2021. The notification further directed that the manufacture, import, stocking, distribution, sale and use of single use plastic including polystyrene and expanded polystyrene commodity shall be prohibited with effect from 01.07.2022.
5. The petitioners state that on the basis of the Plastic Waste Management Rules, 2016, many State Pollution Control Boards have prohibited production, stocking, distribution, sale and use of single use plastic items but, permitted manufacturing of carry bags made of virgin or recyclable plastic above 75 micron in thickness. Non-woven carry bags less than 60 GSM alone are prohibited. The State of Kerala, however, issued a letter dated 24.06.2022 banning single use plastic products included in the list of banned single use plastic products. The non-woven bags were included as serial No. 2 in the list. By not making any distinction based on GSM of non-woven bags, the Kerala State has banned all non-woven bags.
6. The petitioners state that the Sub Committee of Single Window Clearance Board held on 05.03.2019 has granted sanction to manufacture of non-woven carry bags to M/s. K.V. Green Bags in Pathanamthitta District. A report of School for Advanced Research in Polymers (SARP), Department of Chemicals and Petrochemicals under the Government of India has given its opinion that Polypropylene fibre of 60 GSM can be used multiple times and are recyclable at the end of their use. Therefore, the complete ban on the manufacture of non-woven bags as per letter dated 24.06.2022 of the Kerala State Pollution Control Board is illegal and unsustainable.
7. The counsel for the petitioners argued that State Rules were already in place when Central Government made the 60 GSM rule. Under Section 23 of the Environment Protection Act, the Central Government can delegate its powers to a limited extent. A combined reading of Sections 5 and 23 of the Act would show that the State Government has only residuary powers. The Act contemplates regulation alone and there cannot be a complete ban.
8. The counsel for the petitioners submitted that the ban should be only on non-biodegradable woven bags. There is inconsistency between the Central Rules and State Regulations. In view of Article 254(1) of the Constitution, the Central Rules shall
SupremeToday
Important points:Detection of sufficiently large number of cases of fake composite carry bags entering the markets in the State, as would render it practically impossible for the State to prevent tra....
Fundamental right to clean environment of public at large- a right relatable to fundamental right to life under Article 21 of Constitution.
The court upheld the imposition of the fine based on the legal provisions and notifications banning the use of plastic material.
The court established that manufacturers must register under the Plastic Waste Management Rules, 2016, to ensure compliance and prevent environmental hazards.
The impugned notification imposing restrictions on the use of plastic and non-biodegradable materials was upheld by the court, emphasizing the environmental threats posed by plastic and the necessity....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.