S.RAJESWARAN
N. K. Pushpam Achi – Appellant
Versus
K. Rajakumar & Others – Respondent
The petitioner is challenging the Order dated 11.09.2007 made in I.A.No.41 of 2006 in O.S.No.38 of 2006 on the file of the III Additional District Judge, Puducherry.
2. The plaintiff in O.S.No.38 of 2006 on the file of the III Additional District Court at Puducherry is the revision petitioner before this Court. She is aggrieved by the order of the trial court dated 11.09.2007 made in I.A.No.41 of 2006 filed by her under Order I Rule 10(2) C.P.C. to implead the proposed parties/respondents 3 to 5 herein as defendants 3 to 5 in O.S.No.38 of 2006 and respondents 3 to 5 in I.A.No.39 of 2006. The trial court by order dated 11.09.2007 dismissed I.A.No.41 of 2006 and aggrieved by the same, the plaintiff has filed the above Civil Revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.
3. The brief facts which are necessary for the purpose of disposing of the above Civil Revision petition are as follows:
The plaintiff filed O.S.No.38 of 2006 for recovering a sum of Rs.18.25 lakhs from the defendants 1 and 2/respondents 1 and 2 herein with subsequent interest at 30% per annum on the principal amount of Rs.10 lakhs from the date of the plaint till the date of realisation.
3. Shanmugam and others Vs Syndicate Bank and Others A.I.R. 1999 MAD 74 (Relied)
4. Kandasamy and others vs M. Palanisamy and Others 2005 (3) M.L.J. 306
8. Dayanandan Vs Venugopal A.I.R. 1964 MAD 78
9. Andhra Bank ltd. V. Srinivasan
2. V.R. Arunachalam Chettiyar vs Vayinagaram and Others 1989(2) M.L.J. 94
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.