Second defendant is the revision petitioner. He filed the revision to strike off the plaint in O.S.No.97 of 2012 filed by the first respondent herein for injunction.

2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the revision petitioner that the subject matter of the suit in O.S.No.97 of 2012 originally belonged to the third defendant/third respondent herein. The third defendant/third respondent herein agreed to sell the property to the revision petitioner, who is the second defendant in O.S.No.97 of 2012 and also executed the sale deed on 2.1.1993 after receiving consideration and did not turn up for registration. Therefore, the revision petitioner applied to the Registrar for compulsory registration and after enquiry, the sale deed was directed to be registered by order dated 1.12.1994. Thus, the revision petitioner became the owner of the property and he also filed the suit in O.S.No.522 of 1996 on the file of the District Munsif, Villupuram against the third defendant herein and one T.Paramasivam, the father of the second respondent herein/first defendant in O.S.No.97 of 2012. The suit was for declaration of title of the revision petitioner herein and also for recove