K.KALYANASUNDARAM
C. Murugan – Appellant
Versus
Thilagavathy – Respondent
K. Kalyanasundaram, J.
1. These Revision Petitions arise out of the Orders passed by the II Additional Sub-Judge, Coimbatore in E.A. No. 198 of 2009 in E.P. No.179 of 2008. For the sake of convenience and for easy understanding, the Petitioner herein C. Murugan will be hereinafter as Decree-holder, the First Respondent Dr. Thilagavathy will be referred as 3rd Party Obstructor and the Second Respondent-K. Sekaran will be referred as Judgment-Debtor.
2. The Petitioner/Decree-holder instituted a Suit against K. Sekaran/Judgment-Debtor in O.S. No. 764 of 1993 for Specific Performance of the Sale Agreement dated 30.9.1991. The Suit was decreed ex parte on 6.1.2006. On the basis of the decree, a Sale Deed was executed in favour of the Decree-holder and thereupon he laid an Execution Petition E.P. No.179 of 2008 for delivery of possession. In the Execution Petition, 3rd Party Obstructor filed E.A. No. 198 of 2009 under Order 21, Rules 97 & 98 of C.P.C., r/w. 151, C.P.C., seeking adjudication of her right and title over the Petition mentioned property and record the resistance and obstructions of delivery of possession of the property in pursuance of the Decree passed in O.S. No. 7
Brahmdeo Chaudhary v. Rishikesh Prasad Jaiswal and another
Silverline Forum Pvt. Ltd. v. Rajiv Trust & Anr.
Shreenath and another v. Rajesh and another
Devaraja Pillai and another v. K.R. Purushothama Chettiar & another
S. Rajeswari v. S.N. Kulasekaran and others
Banumathi @ Karunaiammal v. A.P. Athanari
Shri Rajasthani Jain Samaj v. V. Subramanian, G. Srinivasan, G.
Mansoor Deen, M.S. and 5 others v. Fathimuthu Beevi and 7 others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.