H.K.SEMA, MARKANDEY KATJU
Som Mittal – Appellant
Versus
Govt. of Karnataka – Respondent
JUDGMENT
H. K. SEMA, J. — 1. Leave granted.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
3. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 28th March, 2006 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore in Criminal Petition No. 1535 of 2006 filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure with a prayer to quash cognizance of offence under Sections 25 and 30(3) of the Karnataka Shops and Commercial Establishments Act, 1961 (in short 'the Act') by Metropolitan Magistrate Traffic Court III.
4. In view of the order that we propose to pass, it may not be necessary to recite the entire facts leading to the filing of the present appeal. Suffice it to say that an unfortunate incident had occurred on 13th December, 2005 in which late Smt. Pratibha Srikant Murthy was stated to have been murdered on her way to work from her residence. Pursuant to the aforesaid incident a complaint was filed on 27th December, 2005 against the appellant alleging violation of Sections 25 and 30(3) of the Act before the Metropolitan Magistrate. On 30th December, 2005, the Metropolitan Magistrate took cognizance of the offences under aforesaid sections of the Act. On 23rd March, 2006, a p
3.(1974) 4 SCC 522 : Jehan v. Delhi Administration...15
8.1964 (5) SCR 1030 : T.Prem v. The Standard...20
1.AIR 1980 SC 898 : Bachan v. State of Punjab...16
5.AIR 1977 SC 366 : Balchand v. State of M.P....30
2.(1972) 1 SCC 452 : Hazari v. Rameshwar...14
7.1963 (3) SCR 338 : East India v. The Collector...20
9.1969 (1) SCR 65 : Boothalinga v. V.T.C....20
2.AIR 1994 SC 1349 : Joginder v. State of U.P....19
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.