SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(P&H) 1541

RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK
Virsa Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Mr. Amarjit Markan

JUDGMENT :

Rameshwar Singh Malik, J.

Present writ petition is directed against the order dated 22.7.2015 (Annexure P-1) passed by the Financial Commissioner (Revenue), Punjab-respondent no.2, whereby claim of the petitioners, being vendees of original big land-owners was declined to be protected, as the petitioners were not found bonafide purchasers, because they purchased the land much after it had already been declared surplus in the hands of their vendors.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.

3. Placing reliance on three judgments of this court in Hanuman Vs. Financial Commissioner (Revenue) Punjab, 1997 (1) RCR (Civil) 496, Surinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab through Secretary to Govt., Revenue Deptt., Punjab, Chandigarh and others, 2004 (2) RCR (Civil) 724 and Paramjit Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab and others, 2015 (7) RCR (Civil) 706, besides placing reliance on Full Bench judgment of this court in Sardara Singh and others Vs. Financial Commissioner and others, 2008 (2) RCR (Civil) 744, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that since the petitioners were vendees of Gurmeet Singh, who purchased the land from original land owner Pritpal Singh and possession fr




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top